Abstract
The very act of mentioning Wittgenstein’s name in connection with either Marx or sociology, let alone both simultaneously, is apt to disturb any self-respecting Wittgensteinian. On the face of it nothing could seem farther from Marx’s celebrated exhortation to philosophers to change the world than Wittgenstein’s admonition that “philosophy may in no way interfere with the use of language . . . it leaves everything as it is”.1 Furthermore, what could form a sharper contrast with Marx’s allegation that history is the history of class struggle than Wittgenstein’s claim that it would be pointless to advance theses in philosophy because everybody would agree about them.2 Wittgenstein’s personal conservatism and his abiding concern with the works of such conservative authors as Spengler, Dostoievsky, Tolstoi and Weininger has led J. C. Nyíri to assert that Wittgenstein’s mature thought is nothing less than a defense of a peculiar brand of neo-conservatism.3 Whatever we may discover about Wittgenstein in the future, it is most unlikely that we shall ever turn up the slightest interest in politics let alone political activism. Finally as regards sociology, early in his career Wittgenstein maintained that “the word ‘philosophy’ must mean something whose place is above or below the natural sciences, not beside them”.4
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford, 1969), I, 124.
Wittgenstein, Ibid., I, 128
Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford, 1969), I, 599.
J. C. Nyíri, “Wittgenstein’s Later Work in Relation to Conservatism”, Wittgenstein and His Times, ed. B. F. McGuinness (Chicago, 1982), pp. 44–68.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (New York, 1961), 4.111.
Anthony Kenny, “Wittgenstein on the Nature of Philosophy”, Wittgenstein and His Times, p. 7.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vermischte Bemerkungen, ed. G. H. von Wright (Frankfurt/Main, 1977), p. 117.
Kenny, op. cit., 21
Fania Pascal, “Wittgenstein: A Personal Memoir”, Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives, ed. C. G. Luckhardt (Ithaca, N.Y., 1979), p. 25.
Wittgenstein, Investigations, p. x.
Maurice Drury, The Danger of Words (London, 1973), p. ix.
Ferrucio Rossi-Landi, “Towards a Marxist Use of Wittgenstein”, Austrian Philosophy: Studies and Texts, ed. J. C. Nyíri (Munich, 1981), p. 145.
David Rubinstein, Marx and Wittgenstein: Social Praxis and Social Explanation (London, 1981).
Ibid., p. 23.
Ibid., p. 24.
Ibid., p. 17.
Alasdair MacIntyre, Marxism and Christianity (New York, 1968), p. 88.
David Rubinstein, op. cit., p. 4.
cf. Allan Janik and Stephen Toulmin, Wittgenstein’s Vienna (New York, 1973), p. 227 et passim.
G. H. von Wright, “Wittgenstein in Relation to His Times”, Wittgenstein and His Times, p. 109.
Rubinstein, op. cit., p. 104.
Charles Taylor, “The Opening Arguments of the Phenomenology”, Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Alasdair Maclntyre (Garden City, 1972), pp. 151–87.
Martin Heidegger, Sein und Seit (14th printing; Tübingen, 1977), p. 120.
Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, 1979).
Hannah Pitkin, Wittgenstein and Justice, (Berkley, 1972), p. 326.
Ibid., p. 340.
Ibid., (Berkley, 1972), p. 328.
See note 11.
Ferrucio Rossi-Landi, loc. cit.
Ibid., p. 139.
J. C. Nyíri, op. cit., pp. 58.
Stephen Toulmin, “Ludwig Wittgenstein”, Encounter 33 (1969), p. 59.
John Passmore, A Hundred Years of Philosophy (London, 1957), p. 449n.
Personal Communication from Stephen Toulmin.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, “Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough”, trans. John Belvershuis, Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives, p. 76.
Pitkin, op. cit., p. ix.
Wittgenstein, Investigations, I, 126.
Rubinstein, op. cit., p. 137.
Rubinstein, Marx and Wittgenstein: Social Praxis and Social Explanation (London, 1981), p. 137.
Pitkin, op. cit., pp. 325–28.
John Danford, Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy (Chicago, 1978), p. 153.
Newton Garver, “Lebensformen”, Lecture to the Institute for Philosophy at the University of Graz, November 4, 1982. Unpublished.
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vorlesungen und Gespräche über Äthetik, Psychologie und Religion, trans. Eberhard Bubser (Göttingen, 1968), p. 32
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vorlesungen und Gespräche über Äthetik, Psychologie und Religion, trans. Eberhard Bubser (Göttingen, 1968), cf. p. 29
Wittgenstein, Investigations, II, xi, pp. 193–211.
Ibid., I, 77.
John Dewey, Reconstruction in Philosophy (New York, 1950), p. 156.
Karl Marx, “The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte”, The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Robert C. Tucker (New York, 1978), p. 595.
Karl Marx, “Towards a Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law: Introduction”, Writings of the Young Marx on Philosophy and Society, ed. Lloyd D. Easton and Kurt H. Guddat (Garden City, 1967), p. 264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janik, A. (1989). Wittgenstein, Marx and Sociology. In: Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 114. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2251-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2251-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7508-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2251-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive