Miracles and Reasoning Based on Experience

Abstract

Applying these principles to the question of the credibility of testimony to the miraculous, Hume says he can give a “proof” against the credibility of such testimony and not just a “probable” argument. We should, therefore, expect an argument to the effect that past experience, when properly considered (i.e. considered in accordance with the above principles), completely supports a judgment against the credibility of such testimony. In accordance with his notion of “proof” we should expect an argument “derived from the relation of cause and effect, and … entirely free from doubt and uncertainty.” “Past experience” should be understood to refer to some form of collective experience and not simply an individual’s own experience — though some of the things Hume says in his essay may suggest otherwise.⁸