Skip to main content

Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks with Reduced Reinforcement

  • Chapter
Bridge Evaluation, Repair and Rehabilitation

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSE,volume 187))

Abstract

The premature deterioration of concrete bridge decks in regions where deicing chemicals are used has created a multi-billion dollar problem in the United States. In this paper, a simple method to extend the life of new concrete bridge decks is explored: the reduction of deck reinforcement. When a reinforcing bar corrodes, its volume will increase, and eventually, the surrounding concrete will crack. With less steel, there will be less material corroding and expanding, and a longer deck life may result. Rather than attempt a precise proof for this thesis, a number of supporting arguments are made. An approximate procedure to estimate the possible gains in deck life resulting from reduced reinforcement is described. The procedure is based on a smeared-cracking finite element model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borgard, B., Warren, C., Somayaji, S. and Heidersbarch, R., “Correlation Between Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel and Voids and Cracks in Concrete Structures,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1211, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Csagoly, Paul F., “Future Bridge Deck Slab Construction,” Concrete Construction, January 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Perdikaris, Phillip and Beim, Sergio, “RC Bridge Decks Under Pulsating and Moving Loads”, Journal of structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 113, No. 3, March, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. “Small Bars Lead to Large Savings”, TR News, September-October 1987, p 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perdikaris, P.C., and Beim, S., “Fatigue Strength of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks,” Presented at the ACI Fall Convention, Physical Models in Engineering Education and Practice, Baltimore, Md., Nov., 1986

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Proceedings of a Seminar Sponsored by the American Society of Civil Engineers and the National Science Foundation, Meher and Okamura Editors, 1986, 696 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fang, I.K., “Behavior of Ontario-Type Bridge Decks on Steel Girders,” Thesis Presented to the Department of Civil Engineering, the University of Texas at Austin, in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beal, David B., “Reinforcement for Concrete Bridge Decks,” NY State Department of Transportation, Engineering Research Division Bureau, Report No.:RR-105 FHWA/NY/RR-83/105, July 83, 32 p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 13th Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1983

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code., 2nd Ed., Ministry of Transportation and Communication, Highway Engineering Division, Ontario, Canada, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete,” State-of-the-Art Report, Task Committee on Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures, Arthur Nilson Chairman, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beal, David B., “Load Capacity of Concrete Bridge Decks,” Journal of the Structural Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 108, No. ST4, April 1982, p 814–832.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abbott, S.P., “Concrete Deck Study,” Report, Bridge Division, Maine Department of Transportation, October 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beal, David B., “Strength of Concrete Bridge Decks,” Research Report, NY State Department of Transportation, Engineering Research Division Bureau, July 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Beeby, A.W., “Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel in Concrete and its Relation to Cracking,” Structural Engineer, March, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bashur, F.K., and Darwin, D., “Nonlinear Model for Reinforced Concrete Slabs,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. ST1, January, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tuuti, Kyosti, “Cracks and Corrosion,” Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute at the Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Batchelor, Barrington deV. and Hewitt, Brian E., “Tests of Model Composite Bridge Decks,” Journal of the American Concrete Institute, Vol. 73, No. 6, June 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kabir, A. F., “Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Panels, Slabs, and Shells for Time Dependent Effects,” UC-SESM Report No. 76-6, University of California at Berkeley, December, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hewitt, Brian E. and Batchelor, Barrington deV., “Punching Shear Strength of Restrained Slabs,” Journal of the Structural Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, No. ST9, September 1975, p 1837–1853.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shiessl, P., “Admissible Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Contribution II 3–17, Inter-Association Colloquium on the Behavior in Service of Concrete Structures, Preliminary Reports, II, Liege, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, C. S., and Scordelis, A., “Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shells of General Form,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, No. ST3, March 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dakhil, F. H., Cady, P., and Carrier, R. E., “Cracking of Fresh Concrete as Related to Reinforcement,” ACI Journal, August, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hand, F.R., Pecknold, D.A., and Schnobrich, W.C., “Nonlinear Layered Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Plates and Shells,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, No. ST7, July 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vallipan, S., and Doolan, T.F., “Nonlinear Stress Analysis of Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. ST 4, Proc. Paper 8845, April 1972, pp. 885–898.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cervenka, V., and Gersde, K. H., “Inelastic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Panels, Part I: Theory,” International Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering Publications, Vol. 31–11, 1971, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rashid, Y. R., “Analysis of Prestressed Concrete Pressure Vessels,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 7, No. 4, April 1968, pp. 334–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dagher, H., Hamilton, W., Kulendran, S. (1990). Durability of Concrete Bridge Decks with Reduced Reinforcement. In: Nowak, A.S. (eds) Bridge Evaluation, Repair and Rehabilitation. NATO ASI Series, vol 187. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2153-5_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2153-5_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7469-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2153-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics