Skip to main content

Eternal Recurrence — Once More

  • Chapter
The New Aspects of Time

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 125))

  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

On at least three different occasions, Peirce insisted on the necessity to admit the cyclical, i.e. self-returning nature of time (1.274, 1.498 and 6.210). This view is altogether incompatible with one essential aspect of his philosophy, i.e. with his tychism which unambiguously rejected the rigorous determinism of classical science; but this, as we shall see, was one of the basic assumptions of the cyclical theory of time. The fact that Peirce did not mention it, shows that he failed to grasp the full meaning of the cyclical theory of time; and this undoubtedly explains why his own arguments in favor of this theory are so obscure and unconvincing. (I shall return to his arguments at the end of this paper.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Samuel Sambursky, The Physical World of Stoics,tr. by Merton Dagut, New York, 1956, Ch. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Will to Power, The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche,Edinburgh and London, 1913, Vol. IX, p. 430.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hans Reichenbach, The Direction of Time,University of California Press, 1956, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  4. In particular in The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics,Princeton, 1969, chs. XIV, XV.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jean Piaget, L’Introduction â la epistemologie génetique,Paris 1974, pp. 204–5; M. t3apek, “The Significance of Piaget’s Researches on the Psychogenesis of Atomism,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science,Vol. VIII (1971), pp. 446–45 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bas C. Van Fraassen, “ 6apek on Eternal Recurrence” The Journal of Philosophy,Vol. LIX, pp. 371–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist,The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. VIII, Evanston 1949, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. (Vapek, op. cit,pp. 230–243: cf. also my article “The Fiction of Instants,” in Studium generale,Vol. 24 (171), pp. 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas A. Goudge, The Thought of C. S. Peirce, Toronto, 1950, p. 244; Murray C. Murphy, The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy ( Cambridge, Mass. 1961 ), pp. 388–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Čapek, M. (1991). Eternal Recurrence — Once More. In: The New Aspects of Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 125. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2123-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2123-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7455-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2123-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics