Skip to main content

Simple Location and Fragmentation of Reality

  • Chapter
The New Aspects of Time

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 125))

Abstract

The term “fallacy of simple location” was coined by A. N. Whitehead in 1925 in his book Science and the Modern World; the two passages of the book that deal with this problem are worth being quoted in full and may serve as an introduction into our topic.

To be published as a contribution to The Hartshorne Festschrift,Process and Divinity, eds. W. R. Reese and Eugene Freeman, scheduled for publication by Open Court in May, 1964.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. N. Whitehead, Science and the Modern World (New York: Macmillan, 1926), pp. 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Bk. II, Chap. XXVII.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. N. Whitehead, op. cit., pp. 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Bergson, Time and Free Will, trans. F. L. Pogson (New York: Harper, 1910), Chap II, passim, esp. pp. 108–09.

    Google Scholar 

  5. “Psychology,” Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., 22 (1886), 547–604.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Müller-Freienfels, The Evolution of Modern Psychology, trans. W. Beran Wolfe (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1935), pp. 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. Flügel, Hundred Years of Psychology (New York: Macmillan, 1933), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie, 14 (1890), 249–292.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller-Freienfels, op. cit., pp. 98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Bergson, Creative Evolution, trans. A. Mitchell, pp. XIX, 169–173; Time and Free Will, pp. 130f.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Faraday, Experimental Researches in Electricity, 2, 293.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Matière et mémoire, p. 233; Creative Evolution, p. 222; The Concept of Nature, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. C. Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., 2 (Oxford, 1891), 176–179

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. W. Hartmann, Gestalt Psychology (New York: Ronald Press, 1935), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cf. my book The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1961), in particular Chap. XIV.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. C. Maxwell, Matter and Motion (New York: Dover, n.d.), pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Mach, The Science of Mechanics, trans. T. J. McCormack, 5th ed. (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co., 1942), pp. 288–289. [6th ed. (LaSalle: Open Court Publishing Co., 1960), pp. 287–288.]

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. B. Stallo, The Concepts and Theories of Modern Physics, ed. P. W. Bridgman (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960), p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hartshorne, “The Parallel Development of Method in Physics and Psychology,” Philosophy of Science, 1,420f.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Opera, ed. J. van Vloten, 8, epistula IV.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Hartshorne, “Contingency and the New Era in Metaphysics,” The Journal of Philosophy, 29 (1932), 457–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Höffding, A History of Modern Philosophy, trans. B. E. Meyer, 1 (New York: Dover, 1955), 353.

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. James, A Pluralistic Universe, Chap. VI; “The Dilemma of Determinism,” The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, esp. pp. 150–152.

    Google Scholar 

  24. St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Q. XXV, art. 4; Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea, Bk. VI, ch. 2. Cf. also Hartshorne’s article, “The Reality of The Past, The Unreality of The Future,” Hibbert Journal, 27 (1939), 246-257.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. James, “Dilemma of Determinism,” op. cit., pp. 150–151, 181; A. N. Whitehead, Adventures of Ideas (New York: Macmillan, 1947), p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Some Problems of Philosophy, p. 144. The term “the principle of absence” was coined by Jean Wahl, Les philosophes pluralistes d’Angleterre etd’Amérique (Paris, 1920), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Čapek, M. (1991). Simple Location and Fragmentation of Reality. In: The New Aspects of Time. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 125. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2123-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2123-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7455-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2123-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics