Advertisement

Nominalism, Empiricism and Conventionalism

  • Mia Gosselin
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 215)

Abstract

The purpose of this last chapter is the investigation of the global epistemological implications of the contemporary nominalistic theories we have studied. These theories depart in many points from logical empiricism, they have relativistic and conventionalistic traits, which are not congenial to the spirit of Carnap’s philosophy. How can we explain these tendencies and what conclusions can we draw? Is their source to be found in nominalism and/or in empiricism, which admittedly contain the seed of scepticism?

Keywords

Fourteenth Century Essential Quality Theoretical Entity Intuitive Knowledge Individual Thing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    G. Leff, The Dissolution of the Medieval Outlook, Harper and Row, New York, London, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 9.
    L. Alanen, S. Knuuttila, “Modality in Descartes and his Predecessors”, in: Modern Modalities, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988, p.30.Google Scholar
  3. 15.
    A summary of the most common accusations formulated against Ockham can be found in: F. Rapp, “Le procs du nominalisme”, in: L’ glise et la vie religieuse en Occident d la fin du moyen ge, Nouvelle Clio, 1971, p.332–345.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    T.K. Scott, “Ockham on Evidence, Necessity and Intuition”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, VII, 1969, 1, pp.27–49.Google Scholar
  5. 27.
    Cf. Willem van Ockham, Evidente kennis en theologische waarheden, vertaald en geannoteerd door Dr. E.P. Bos, Het Wereldvenster, Weesp, 1984, p.15.Google Scholar
  6. 51.
    W.V.O. Quine, J.S. Ullian, The Web of Belief, Random House, New York, 1970, p.54.Google Scholar
  7. 54.
    Cf. e.g. N. Tinbergen, Curious naturalists, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1958, part two.Google Scholar
  8. 55.
    Cf. Chapter 8 and G.A. Miller and P.M. Gildea, “How Children Learn Words”, Scientific American, September, 1987, p.89.Google Scholar
  9. 56.
    The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Minerals and Rocks, Artia, Prague, 1977, p.272.Google Scholar
  10. 59.
    D.M. Armstrong, A Theory of Universals, Cambridge University Press, London, 1978, p.57.Google Scholar
  11. 60.
    M. Blarney, R. Fitter, Wild Flowers, Collins Gem Guide, Collins, London and Glasgow, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. 61.
    Cf. E. Heimans, H.W. Heinsius, Jac. P. Thysse, Geillustreerde Flora van Nederland, W. Versluys, Amsterdam, Djakarta, 1951.Google Scholar
  13. 62.
    J. Powers, Philosophy and the New Physics, Methuen, London & New York, 1982, p.165.Google Scholar
  14. 65.
    M. Gosselin, “Science and Society. The Responsability of the Scientist”, in: Science and Society, M. Gosselin, F. Demeyere (eds.), C.E.E. VUB, Brussels, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 66.
    Jean Piaget, Le Structuralisme, PUF, 1968, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. 70.
    I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening, Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, London, New York, 1983, p.17.Google Scholar
  17. 77.
    G. Rocci, Scienza e convenzionalismo, Bulzari Editore, Roma, 1978, p.263 and passim.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Gosselin
    • 1
  1. 1.Belgium

Personalised recommendations