Abstract
My subject is nominalism in general and contemporary nominalism in particular. I examine in this book the advantages and disadvantages of the ontologies and epistemologies of W.V.O. Quine and N. Goodman, against the background of traditional nominalism. Both authors are heirs of logical empiricism; they share the idea that constructivistic systems, suitable as an instrument for a scientific description of parts of the world, should be in accordance with the nominalistic principle that the building blocks must be individuals that are sums of their parts and nothing else. Next to this, there are several other fundamental points of view they have in common. Like most heirs of a construction, the first thing they have done was transform it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J.R. Weinberg, Abstraction, Relation and Induction, The Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison & Milwaukee, 1965.
I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London, New York, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gosselin, M. (1990). Introduction. In: Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism. Synthese Library, vol 215. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2119-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2119-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7453-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2119-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive