Abstract
In this paper it is considered a formal approach to the problem of aggregating individual opinions in a fuzzy group, when alternatives can be represented in a real hyper-space and each individual defines his/her fuzzy set of non rejectable alternatives. On one hand, weighted aggregation rule for consensus opinion is axiomatically justified. On the other hand, it is shown a sufficient condition for the stability of such consensus solution.
Research supported by Dirección General de Investigación Cientifica y Técnica (National Grant number PB88-0137)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
K.J. Arrow ( 1951, 1964), Social Choice and Individual Values, Wiley, New York.
D. Black (1958), The Theory of Committees and Elections, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
W. Cholewa (1985), Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions: an Axiomatic Approach, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17, 249–258.
D. Dubois and J.L. Koning (1989), Social Choice Axioms forFuzzy Sets Aggregation,Fuzzy Sets Syst. (to appear).
D. Dubois and H. Prade (1985), A review of Fuzzy sets Aggregation Connectives, Inf. Sci. 36, 85–121.
L.W. Fung and K.S. Fu (1975), An Axiomatic Approach to Rational Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment; in: L.A. Zadeh, K.S. Fu, K. Tanaka and M. Shimura (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets and their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes, Academic Press, New York, pp. 227–256.
K. Inada (1964), A Note on Simple Majority Rule, Econometrica 32, 525–531.
J. Montero (1985), A note on Fung-Fu’s Theorem, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17, 259–269.
J. Montero (1988a), Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Non-Homogeneous Group, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 25, 15–20.
J. Montero (1988b), An Axiomatic Approach to Fuzzy Multicriteria Analysis; in: M.M. Gupta and T. Yamakawa (Eds.), Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge-Based Systems, Decision and Control, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 259–269.
J. Montero (1989), Weighted Aggregation and Single Peaked Intensities, Workshop on Aggregation and Best Choices on Imprecise Opinions, Brussels.
P.K. Pattanaik (1971), Voting and Collective Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
A.K. Sen (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco.
J.C. Vansnick (1987), Intensity of Preference; in: Y. Sawaragi, K. Inoue and H. Nakayama (Eds.), Toward Interactive and Intelligent Decision Support Systems (Volume 2), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 220–229.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Montero, J. (1990). Single-Peakedness in Weighted Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions in a Fuzzy Group. In: Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds) Multiperson Decision Making Models Using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory. Theory and Decision Library, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2109-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2109-2_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7448-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2109-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive