Skip to main content

To Encourage or Repress? Corporate Policy and Whistle-Blowing

  • Chapter
People in Corporations

Part of the book series: Issues in Business Ethics ((IBET,volume 1))

  • 96 Accesses

Abstract

Whistle-blowing in its simplest form involves one party accusing another of a breach of an ethical or legal duty. In the context of a corporation, the accusation is directed toward an action attributable to the organisation (target firm) itself. The accusation can be made within the corporation, characterised as internal whistle-blowing, or may be made public outside of the organisation, commonly called external whistle-blowing (De George, 1986).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Bar Association: 1983, Model Rules of Professional Conduct (amended in 1987, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S.: 1984, Secrets, New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N.: 1982, Business Ethics, Englewood Cliffs, N. J: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, R.: 1988, “Making the World Safe for Whistle-blowers”, Technology Review, January, 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R.T.: 1981, “Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations”, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T.: 1986, Business Ethics, 2nd Edition, New York: Macmillan, Chapter 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, J.B. and M.P. Miceli: 1985, “Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 10, 823–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W., F.F. Gibson, J.O. Blackburn, D. Whitman, F.W. McCarty, and B.A. Brennan: 1989, Modern Business Law, 2nd Edition, New York: Random House. (Initiatives reprinted at pages 137–139).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliston, F.A.: 1982a, “Civil Disobedience and Whistleblowing: A Comparative Appraisal of Two Forms of Dissent”, Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliston, F.A.: 1982b, “Anonymity and Whistleblowing”, Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliston, F.A.: 1982c, “Anonymous Whistleblowing”, Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 1, 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, D.B., MP. Miceli and D.J. Cohen: 1987, “Oppositionists and Group Norms: The Reciprocal Influence of Whistle-blowers and Co-workers”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, E. and M.A. von Glinow: 1985, “Ethical Ambivalence and Organizational Reward Systems”, Academy of Management Review, 10, 814–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J.W.: 1987, “Ethical Tension Points in Whistle-blowing”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinfield, N.R.: 1986, “The Whistle Blowers’ Morning After”, The New York Times, (November 9), Section 3: Business, p. 1 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H.: 1982, Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M.C.: 1987, “Whistle-blowing: Acts of Courage are Often Discouraged”, Business and Society Review, Fall, 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M.P. and J.P. Near: 1984, “The Relationship Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status: A Discriminant Analysis”, Academy of Management Journal, 27, 687–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P. and M.P. Miceli: 1985, “Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistle-blowing”, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J.P. and M.P. Miceli: 1986, “Retaliation Against Whistle-Blowers: Predictors and Effects”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71,137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R.P.: 1987, “What Can Managers Do About Unethical Management”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, P.: 1989, Conversation with Patricia Reese, Director of Finance and Administration of the Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC (April 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, M.N.: 1987, “Conjectures on the Dynamics of Secrecy and the Secrets Business”, Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunfee, T.W. (1990). To Encourage or Repress? Corporate Policy and Whistle-Blowing. In: Enderle, G., Almond, B., Argandoña, A. (eds) People in Corporations. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2083-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2083-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2083-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics