Abstract
Mesostoma species and other typhloplanid flatworms are predators found in a wide variety of habitats. Laboratory observations of some Mesostoma spp found in shallow aquatic habitats (referred to as ‘littoral species’) have revealed a wide variety of prey killing mechanisms: 1) mucus trapping, 2) sit-and-wait predation, 3) releasing a toxin into the water, and 4) active searching. We review the existing literature on these mechanisms. We also describe for the first time the predatory behavior of a pelagic Mesostoma sp. found in Brazilian lakes.
The existing literature is also reviewed to assess the potential impact of Mesostoma species and related genera on the aquatic invertebrate community. Mesostoma has a high potential for population increase and has been found in high densities in some shallow aquatic habitats. Single prey experiments show that a number of Mesostoma species feed heavily on mosquito larvae, some chironomid larvae and some daphnids but considerably less on most copepods and ostracods. Prey preference experiments reflect the same trends. Hence, these predation studies suggest that the flatworms, at high densities, should reduce populations of certain prey speces and, consequently, alter community structure. Field studies support this prediction. Mesostoma species, at high densities, appear to be important predators of mosquito larvae in shallow aquatic habitats even under conditions where high densities of planktivorous fishes had little impact. They also appear to alter Zooplankton community structure. However, much of the field evidence is correlational and not experimental. No studies have assessed the impact of pelagic typhloplanids on Zooplankton community structure.
It is concluded that many more manipulative field experiments are needed to assess the impact of typhloplanids on aquatic invertebrate communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, J., 1980. The feeding behaviour of Bdellocephala punctata, a freshwater triclad. Oikos 35: 2–7.
Becker, N., 1984. Ökologie das Culicinae in Südwest Deutschland. Thesis, Univ. Heidelberg.
Black, R. W. & N. G. Hairston, 1988. Predator driven changes in community structure. Oecologia 77: 468–479.
Blaustein, L., 1988. Biological interactions in rice fields: A community-ecology approach to mosquito control. Ph. D. dissertation. University of California, Davis. 424 pp.
Blaustein, L., 1990. Evidence for predatory flatworms as organizers of Zooplankton and mosquito community structure in rice fields. Hydrobiologia, in press.
Case, T. J. & R. K. Washino, 1979. Flatworm control of mosquito control of mosquito larvae in northern California rice fields. Science 206: 1412–1414.
Collins, F. H. & R. K. Washino, 1978. Microturbellarians as natural predators of mosquito larvae in northern California rice fields. Proc. Calif. Mosq. Vector Control Assoc. 46: 91.
Collins, F. H. & R. K. Washino, 1979. Factors affecting the density of Culex tarsalis and Anopheles freeborni in northern California rice fields. Proc. Calif. Mosq. Vector Control Assoc. 47: 97–98.
Crowder, L. B. & W. E. Cooper, 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.
Davey, R. B. & M. V. Meisch, 1977. Control of the dark rice field mosquito, Psorophora columbae, by the mosquitofish, Gambusia afflnis, and the green sunfish, Lepomis cyanellus in Arkansas rice fields. Mosq. News 37: 258–262.
de Bernardi, R., G. Giussani & M. Manca, 1987. Cladocera: Predators and prey. Hydrobiologia 145: 225–243.
De Beauchamp P., 1954. Un rhabdocoele pelagigue dans un lac du Ruanda, Mesostoma inversum n.sp.. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 50: 157–164.
De Meester, L. & H. J. Dumont, 1990. The vertical distribution of Mesostoma sp. as related to satiation: some experimental observation. Hydrobiologia, this volume.
De Silva, P. K., 1976. The importance of mucus of Dendrocoelum lacteum (Muller) (Turbellaria, Triclada) in community existence. Arch. Hydrobiol. 78: 363–374.
Dodson, S. I., 1970. Complementary feeding niches sustained size-selective predation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 131–137.
Dodson, S. I., 1974. Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55: 605–613.
Dumont, H. J. & I. Carels, 1987. Flatworm predator (Mesostoma cf. lingua) releases a toxin to catch planktonic prey (Daphnia magna). Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 699–702.
Dumont, H. J. & S. Schorreels, 1990. A laboratory study of the feeding of Mesostoma lingua (Schmidt) (Turbellaria: Neorhabdocoela) on Daphnia magna Straus at four different temperatures. Hydrobiologia, this volume.
Dumont, H. J., I. Miron, U. Dall’Asta, W. Decraemer, C. Claus & D. Somers, 1973. Limnological aspects of some Moroccon Atlas lakes, with reference to some physical and chemical variables, the nature and distribution of the phyto- and Zooplankton, including a note on possibilities for the development of inland fishery. Int. Revue Ges. Hydrobiol. 58: 33–60.
Fiore, L., 1971. A mechanism for self-inhibition of population growth in the flatworm. Mesostoma ehrenbergii (Focke). Oecologia 7: 356–360.
Gall, G., J.J. Cech, Jr., V. Resh & R. K. Washino, 1980. Mosquitofish — an established predator. Calif. Agric. 34: 21–22.
Hall, D. J., S. T. Threlkeld, C. W. Burns, P. H. Crowley, 1976. The size efficiency hypothesis and the structure of Zooplankton communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7: 177–208.
Heitkamp, U., 1972. Die mechanimen der subitan- und daureibildung bei Mesostoma lingua (Albildgaard, 1789) (Turbellaria, Neorhabdocoela). Z. Morph. Tiere. 71: 203–209.
Holling, C. S., 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91: 385–398.
Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih (eds), 1987. Predation: Direct and indirect effects on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England Hanover (NH), 000 pp.
Kolasa, J., 1984. Predation on mosquitoes by juveniles of Mesostoma spp. (Turbellaria). Freshwat. Invert. Biol. 3: 42–47.
Kolosa, J., 1987. Population growth in some Mesostoma species (Turbellaria) predatory on mosquitoes. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 205–212.
Krebs, J. R., 1978. Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs, J. R. & N. B. Davies (eds) Behavioral Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, pp. 23–63. Black-well Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Lane, P. A., 1978. Role of invertebrate predation in structuring Zooplankton communities. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 485–480.
MacIsaac, H. J. & T. C. Hutchinson, 1985. The influence of benthic tundra pond vegetation and prey behavior on Zooplankton predation by the flatworm, Mesostoma lingua. Can, J. Zool. 63: 1617–1621.
Maly, E. J., S. Schoenholts & M. T. Arts, 1980. The influence of flatworm predation on Zooplankton inhabiting small ponds. Hydrobiologia 76: 233–240.
McDaniel, I., 1977. Use of flatworms for control of mosquitoes and blackflies. Proc. First Inter-regional Conference on North American Black Flies, pp. 151–152.
Mead, A. P., 1978. A rhabdocoele predator of mosquitoes. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 72: 591–594.
Palchick, S., 1984. The potential of flatworms (Turbellaria: Typhloplanidae) as biological control agents of mosquitoes. Bull. Soc. Vector Ecol. 9: 17–20.
Pennak, R. W., 1978, Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York 803 pp.
Rocha, O. T. Matsamura-Tundisi, J. A. Tundisi & C. M. P. Fonseca, 1990. Predation on and by pelagic Turbellaria in some lakes in Brazil. Hydrobiologia, this volume.
Runegar, M. T. C. & I. R. Falconer, 1982. The in vivo and in vitro biological effects of the peptide Hepatotoxin from the blue green algae Microcystis aeruginosa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 78: 363–366.
Ruttner, F., 1952. Planktonstudien der Deutschen Limnologischen Sunda-Expedition. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 21: 1–274.
Schwartz, S. S. & P. D. N. Hebert, 1982. Laboratory study of feeding behavior of the rhabdocoel Mesostoma ehrenbergii on pond Cladocera. Can. J. Zool. 60: 1305–1307.
Schwartz, S. S. & P. D. N. Hebert, 1986. Prey preference and utilization by Mesostoma lingua (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela) at a low artic site. Hydrobilogia 135: 251–257.
Service, M., 1976. Mosquito Ecology: Field Sampling Methods. Jphn Wiley & Sons, New York & London.
Steinman, P. & E. Von Bresslau, 1913. Die Strudelwurmer (Turbellaria). In: E. Ziegler & R. Woltereck (eds), Monographien einheimischer Tiere, Leipzig, pp. 1–380.
Tsai, S. C. & E. F. Legner, 1977. Exponential growth in culture of the planarian mosquito predator Dugesia dorotocephala (Woodworth). Mosq. News 37: 474–478.
Von Bresslau, E., 1933. Platyhelminthes Turbellaria. In: T. Krumback (ed.), Hnadbuch der Zoologie, Vol. 2. De Gruyter, pp. 53–320.
Von Graf, L., 1913. Turbellaria. II. Rhabdocoelida. Das Tierreich 20: 268–271.
Young, J. O., 1973. The prey and predators of Phaenocora typhlops (Vejdovsky) (Turbellaria: Rhabdocoela) living in a small pond. J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 637–643.
Young, J. O., 1978. An ecological study of Phaenocora unipuctata (Orsted) (Turbellaria; Rhabdocoela): Predator-Prey interrelationships. Hydrobiologia 60: 145–149.
Yu, H. S. & E. F. Legner, 1975. Regulation of aquatic Diptera by planaria. Entomophaga 21: 3–12.
Zaret, T., 1980. Predaton in freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut. 187 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blaustein, L., Dumont, H.J. (1990). Typhloplanid flatworms (Mesostoma and related genera): Mechanisms of predation and evidence that they structure aquatic invertebrate communities. In: Dumont, H.J., Tundisi, J.G., Roche, K. (eds) Intrazooplankton Predation. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2067-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2067-5_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7428-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2067-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive