Skip to main content

Estimating predation risk in zooplankton communities: the importance of vertical overlap

  • Chapter
Intrazooplankton Predation

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 60))

  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

In order to estimate predation risk in nature, two basic components of predation need to be quantified: prey vulnerability, and density risk. Prey vulnerability can be estimated from clearance rates obtained from enclosure experiments with and without predators. Density risk is a function of predator density, and the spatial and temporal overlap of the predator and prey populations. In the current study we examine the importance of the vertical component of overlap in making accurate estimates of predation risk from the invertebrate predator Mesocyclops edax on rotifer versus crustacean prey. The results indicate that assumptions of uniform predator and prey densities cause a significant underestimation of predation risk for many crustacean prey due to the coincident vertical migration of these prey with the predator. The assumption of uniformity is more reasonable for estimating predation risk for most rotifer prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, J. D., 1976. Life history patterns in zooplankton. Am. Nat. 110: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. A. & H. A. Vanderploeg, 1982. In situ predatory behavior of Mysis relicta in Lake Michigan. Hydrobiologia 93: 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, Z. & C. H. Fernando, 1978. Prey selection by the cyclopoid copepods Mesocyclops edax and Cyclops vicinus. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 2505–2510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, Z. & C. H. Fernando, 1979. The impact of predation by the copepod Mesocyclops edax (Forbes) on zooplankton in three lakes in Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Zool. 57: 940–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150: 28–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Confer, J. L., 1971. Intrazooplankton predation by Mesocyclops edax at natural prey densities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 663–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I., 1974. Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55: 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, S. I., 1975. Predation rates of zooplankton in arctic ponds. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 426–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R. W. & S. R. McComas, 1980. The roles of zooplankter escape ability and fish size selectivity in the selective feeding and impact of planktivorous fish. In: W. C. Kerfoot (ed), Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities. University Press of New England, (NH), Lond.: 587–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drenner, R. W., F. deNoyelles Jr. & D. Kettle, 1982. Selective impact of filter-feeding gizzard shad on zooplankton community structure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 27: 965–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorenko, A. Y., 1975. Instar and species-specific diets in two species of Chaoborus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folt, C. L., J. T. Rybock & C. R. Goldman, 1982. The effect of prey composition and abundance on the predation rate and selectivity of Mysis relicta. Hydrobiologia 93: 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, J. E. & S. A. Gannon, 1975. Observations on the narcotization of crustacean zooplankton. Crustaceana 28: 220–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauld, D. T., 1951. The grazing rate of planktonic copepods. J. mar. biol. Ass. UK 29: 695–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. Volume 2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 1115 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M. R. & R. P. Hassett, 1982. Estimating the grazing impact of marine micro-zooplankton. Mar. Biol. 67: 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, J. T., 1980. Release and cycling of nutrients between planktonic algae and herbivores. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25: 620–632.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. L. & H. W. Li, 1979. Species-specific factors affecting predator-prey interactions of the copepod Acanthocyclops vernalis with its natural prey. Limnol. Oceanogr. 24: 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G. E. & J. J. Gilbert, 1970. Notes on quantitative sampling of natural populations of planktonic rotifers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 816–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, G. E. & E. J. Maly, 1981. Vertical distributions and zooplankton predation in a small temperate pond. Can. J. Zool. 59: 1720–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miracle, M. R., 1977. Migration, patchiness and distribution in time and space of planktonic rotifers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W. J., N. A. Slade & G. L. Vinyard, 1976. Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 57: 1304–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, W. J., 1979. The predator-prey interaction of planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Am. Sci. 67: 572–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohman, M. D., 1988. Behavioral responses of zooplankton to predation. Bull. mar. Sci. 43: 530–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pivoda, B., 1977. Migration of planktonic rotifers in Lunzer Obersee (Austria). Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. 8: 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prepas, E., 1978. Sugar-frosted Daphnia: An improved fixative technique for Cladocera. Limnol. Oceanogr. 23: 557–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, K. F., 1987. Post-encounter vulnerability of some rotifer prey types to predation by the copepod Acanthocyclops robustus. Hydrobiologia 147: 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry 2nd Edition. W. H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco, CA. 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threlkeld, S. T. & J. M. Dirnberger, 1986. Benthic distributions of planktonic copepods, especially Mesocyclops edax. Syllogeus 58: 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E., 1983. Invertebrate predation on planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104: 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E., 1984. Laboratory and field experiments on the feeding ecology of the cyclopoid copepod, Mesocyclops edax. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 575–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E., 1986. The swimming and feeding behavior of Mesocyclops. Hydrobiologia 134: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E., 1987. Predator-prey interactions between omnivorous diaptomid copepods and rotifers: The role of prey morphology and behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E. & R. E. Magnien, 1982. Diel vertical migration in Mesocyclops edax: Implications for predation rate estimates. J. Plankton Res. 4: 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, C. E., M. E. Stoeckel & L. J. Schoeneck, 1989. Predation risk and the structure of freshwater zooplankton communities. Oecologia. 79: 76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodmansee, R. A. & B. J. Grantham, 1961. Diel vertical migrations of two zooplankters (Mesocyclops and Chaoborus) in a Mississippi lake. Ecology 42: 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

H. J. Dumont J. G. Tundisi K. Roche

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williamson, C.E., Stoeckel, M.E. (1990). Estimating predation risk in zooplankton communities: the importance of vertical overlap. In: Dumont, H.J., Tundisi, J.G., Roche, K. (eds) Intrazooplankton Predation. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 60. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2067-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2067-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7428-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2067-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics