Abstract
Having attempted to demonstrate that a number of other approaches are unsatisfactory, I turn now to the development of a theory of speaker reference which gives primacy to the intentions of the speaker. After some preliminary remarks, I shall start with two views of this sort that seem to me inadequate. My own approach is detailed in section 2, and the remainder of the chapter is a defense of that approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See H. P. Grice, “Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions”.
Grice, “Utterer’s Meaning”, p. 151.
Grice, “Utterer’s Meaning” p. 154.
Grice, “Utterer’s Meaning” p. 155.
“Speaker Reference”, presented to the Eastern Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association, December 1983.
David Kaplan, “Dthat”.
“Dthat”, pp. 396–97.
“Dthat”, p. 396.
Wettstein, “How to Bridge the Gap”, p. 68.
Biro, “Intention, Demonstration, and Reference”, p. 38.
Ibid.
Ibid., pp. 38–39.
Kaplan, “Dthat”, p. 389.
Marcia Yudkin & Janice M. Moulton, Guidebook for Publishing Philosophy, 1986 ed., p. 171.
Charles Chastain, “Reference and Context”, pp. 194–269.
Chastain, “Reference”, pp. 212–13.
Donnellan, “Speaker Reference”, p. 43.
Chastain, “Reference”, p. 208.
Donnellan, “Speaker Reference”, p. 37.
Donnellan, Ibid., p. 36 (emphasis added).
Donnellan, Ibid., p. 38.
Donnellan, “Speaker Reference”, p. 38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bertolet, R. (1990). Speaker Reference. In: What is Said. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 49. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2061-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2061-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7425-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2061-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive