Skip to main content

Genotypic differences in boron accumulation in barley: Relative susceptibilities to boron deficiency and toxicity

  • Chapter
Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition

Part of the book series: Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences ((DPSS,volume 42))

Abstract

Boron accumulation in genotypes of barley displaying a large range of susceptibility to B toxicity was studied in solution culture experiments. The relationship between susceptibility to B toxicity and to B deficiency was also examined.

Plants were cultured for 5–6 weeks at B concentrations ranging from deficient to toxic and then examined for dry matter production and B contents of roots and shoots. The effect on grain production of B supply from soil was also studied.

At low and excessive B supply, respectively, symptoms of B deficiency and toxicity developed and growth was depressed. The extent to which individual genotypes were affected varied greatly and the responses closely reflected differences in B content.

At high B supply, genotypes with most tolerance to excess B accumulated less B in both roots and shoots than did genotypes susceptible to B toxicity. B concentrations in roots were always much lower than in shoots. No genotype displayed an ability to tolerate shoot B concentrations greater than 150–200 mg kg-1 dry matter without growth being depressed. It was concluded that tolerance to excess B in barley was governed by the ability of genotypes to restrict B uptake.

At low B supply, genotypes tolerant to excess B had relatively low tissue B concentrations compared to other genotypes, and were susceptible to B deficiency. Conversely, genotypes that had relatively high tissue B concentrations, and were susceptible to B toxicity, were the least susceptible to B deficiency.

Barley genotypes displayed marked differences in rates of B uptake (B accumulation), and these differences were independent of B supply. The order of genotypes when ranked for B concentrations in either roots or shoots was identical at all levels of supply. Similar patterns emerged with respect to grain production.

These results have two important implications. Firstly, they suggest that genotypes can be assessed simultaneously for relative susceptibility to both B deficiency and toxicity without imposing severe nutrient stress, because relative B concentrations of roots and shoots directly reflect these susceptibilities. Secondly, they point to a major complication for breeding programs aimed at incorporating either increased B efficiency or tolerance into commercial varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bowen J E and Nissen P 1976 Boron uptake by excised barley roots. I. Uptake into the free space. Plant Physiol. 57, 353–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford G R 1971 Boron. In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. Ed. H D Chapman, pp 33–61. Chapman, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright B, Rathjen A J, Sparrow D H B, Pauli J G and Zarcinas B A 1987 Boron tolerance in Australian varieties of wheat and barley. In Genetic Specificity of Mineral Nutrition in Plants. Eds. B C Loughman and W H Gabelman. pp 139 – 151. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright B, Zarcinas B A and Mayfield A H 1984 Toxic concentrations of boron in a red-brown earth at Gladstone, South Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 22, 261–272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright B, Zarcinas B A and Spouncer L R 1986 Boron toxicity in South Australian barley crops. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 37, 351–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee B N, Chatterjee M and Das N R 1980 Note on the differences in the response of wheat varieties to boron. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 50, 796–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton F M 1944 Deficiency, toxicity and accumulation of boron in plants. J. Agric. Res. 69, 237–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta U C, Jame Y W, Campbell C A, Leyshon A J and Nicholaichuk W 1985 Boron toxicity and deficiency: A review. Can. J. Soil Sci. 65, 381–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge R and Podlesak W 1985 Plant critical levels for the evaluation of boron toxicity in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plant and Soil 83, 381–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan C R 1961 Plant varieties and species in relation to the occurrence of deficiencies and excesses of certain nutrient elements. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 27, 220–223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munns D N, Johnson C M and Jacobson L 1963 Uptake and distribution of manganese in oat plants. I. Varietal variation. Plant and Soil 19, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nable R O 1988 Resistance to boron toxicity amongst several barley and wheat cultivars — A preliminary examination of the resistance mechanism. Plant and Soil 112, 45–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oertli J J and Roth J A 1969 Boron nutrition of sugar beet, cotton, and soybean. Agron. J. 61, 191–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohki K, Wilson D O and Anderson O E 1980 Manganese deficiency and toxicity sensitivities of soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 72, 713–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli J G, Rathjen A J, Cartwright B and Nable R O 1990 Selection parameters for assessing the tolerance of wheat to high concentrations of boron. In Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Eds. N El Bassam, M Dambroth and B C Loughman. pp 361–369. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathjen A J, Cartwright B, Pauli J G, Moody D B and Lewis J 1987 Breeding for tolerance of mineral toxicities with special reference to boron. In Perspectives and Priorities in Plant Production Research. Eds. P G E Searle and B G Davey. pp 111–130. Sydney University Press, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven J A 1980 Short- and long-distance transport of boric acid in plants. New Phytol. 84, 231–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenauer H M, Walsh L M and Hoeft R G 1973 Testing soils for sulphur, boron, molybdenum and chlorine. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. Eds. L M Walsh and J D Beaton, pp 173–200. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Inc., Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter D J 1986 Temperate and sub-tropical crops. In Plant Analysis — An Interpretation Manual. Eds. D J Reuter and J B Robinson, pp 38–99. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson A D and Snowball K 1986 Nutrient deficiency and toxicity symptoms. In Plant Analysis — An Interpretation Manual. Eds. D J Reuter and J B Robinson, pp 13–19. Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarcinas B A and Cartwright B 1983 Analysis of soil and plant material by inductively coupled plasma — optical emission spectrometry. CSIRO Aust., Div. Soils, Tech. Paper No. 45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nable, R.O., Cartwright, B., Lance, R.C.M. (1990). Genotypic differences in boron accumulation in barley: Relative susceptibilities to boron deficiency and toxicity. In: El Bassam, N., Dambroth, M., Loughman, B.C. (eds) Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7421-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2053-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics