Abstract
The salinity tolerance of plants exhibits a great importance in agriculture of arid areas where the salinization of soils is enhanced by irrigation in an increasing scale. Arid areas in this respect are problem areas. In humid regions the salt-balance in natural ecosystems as well as in agro-ecosystems is much more favourable. Cultivated plants, used by mankind as crop-plants, are almost all rather salt-sensitive. Plants growing naturally on saline stands have evolved various mechanisms to cope with salinity.
Several types of halophytes can be distinguished. Chemically defined halophyte types are not so clearly arranged on a salinity tolerance scale than ecophysiologically and/or anatomically-morphologically defined plant types. Thus, especially halo-succulent and salt-recreting plants are the main groups, other than the highly selective grasses. Within these groups, the concept of ecotypes has been used. It is obvious, that taxonomic relations of the halophytes give indications for a typical genetic background of salinity tolerance which, however, is very complex. This leads to altered and more precise descriptions of the phenomenon ‘salinity tolerance’. The latter has to be regarded in more than one aspect on the levels of the organell, the cell, the plant tissue, the organ and the whole individual plant. An outlook to agricultural perspectives is given.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert R 1975 Salt regulation in halophytes. Oecologia (Berlin) 21, 57–71.
Albert R 1982 Halophyten. In Pflanzenökologie und Mineralstoffwechsel. Ed. H Kinzel, pp 33–213. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
Albert R and Kinzel H 1973 Unterscheidung von Physiotypen bei Halophyten des Neusiedlerseegebietes (Österreich). Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 70, 138–157.
Breckle S W 1976 Zur Ökologie und zu den Mineralstoffverhältnissen absalzender und nichtabsalzender Xero-Halophyten in Utah, USA. Diss. Bot. 35, Vaduz, 169 p.
Breckle S W 1986 Studies on halophytes from Iran and Afghanistan. II. Ecology of halophytes along salt gradients. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 89B, 203–215.
Chapman V J 1942 The new perspective in the halophyte. Quart. Rev. Biol. 17, 291–311.
Duvigneaud P and Denayer de Smet S 1968 Essai de classification chimique (éléments mineraux) des plantes gypsicoles du bassin de l’Ebre. Bull. Soc. R. Bot. Belg. 101, 279–291.
Eijk M van 1939 Analyse der Wirkung des NaCl auf die Entwicklung, Sukkulenz und Transpiration bei Salicornia herbacea sowie Untersuchungen über den Einfluß der Salzaufnahme auf die Wurzelatmung bei Aster tripolium. Extr. Rec. Trav. Bot. Neerland. 36, 559–657.
Harmer P M, Benne E J, Laughlin W M and Key C 1953 Factors affecting crop response to sodium applied as common salt on Michigan muck soil. Soil Sci. 76, 1–17.
Hayward H E and Wadley C H 1949 Plant growth on saline and alkali soils. Adv. Agron. 1, 1–38.
Hedenström H von and Breckle S W 1974 Obligate halophytes? A test with tissue culture methods. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 74, 183–185.
Henkel P A and Shakhov A A 1945 The ecological significance of the water regime of certain halophytes (In Russian). Bot. Zh. 30, 154–166.
Levitt J 1980 Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses, 2 vols. (2nd ed.), Acad. Press, New York.
Malkin E and Waisel Y 1986 Mass selection for salt resistance in Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana). Physiol. Plant. 66, 443–446.
Mozafar A and Goodin J R 1970 Vesiculated hairs: A mechanism for salt tolerance in Atriplex halimus. Plant Physiol. 45, 62–65.
Oertli J J 1976 The physiology of salt injury in plant production. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 2, 195–202.
Osmond C B, Björkman O and Anderson D 1980 Physiological Processes in Plant Ecology: Towards a Synthesis with Atriplex. Ecol. Studies 36, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 468 p.
Reimann C and Breckle S W 1987a Salt secretion in some Chenopodium species. Flora 180, 289–296.
Reimann C and Breckle S W 1987b Anatomie und Entwicklung der Blasenhaare von Chenopodium Arten. Flora 180, 275–288.
Repp G, McAlister D R and Wiebe H H 1959 Salt resistance of protoplasm as a test for the salt tolerance of agricultural plants. Agron. J. 51, 311–314.
Repp G 1964 L’Écophysiologie des Halophytes au Niveau Cellulaire. Bull. Soc. Franc. Physiol. Végét. 10, 209–227.
Richards L A (ed.) 1954 Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Handbook No. 60, Washington, DC, 160 p.
Schirmer U and Breckle S W 1982 The role of bladders for salt removal in some Chenopodiaceae, mainly Atriplex-species. Contributions to the ecology of Halophytes, Tasks for Vegetation Science, vol. 2. Eds. D N Sen and K S Rajpurohit. pp 215–231. Junk, The Hague.
Soloviev V A 1967 Pathways of regulation of the content of excess absorbed ions in plant tissues (with sodium ions as an example). Sov. Plant. Physiol. 14, 915–923 (In Russian: Fiziol. Rasten. 14, 1093–1103.
Stocker O 1928 Das Halophytenproblem. Ergeb. Biol. 3, 365–353.
Tsopa E 1939 La végétation des halophytes du nord de la Roumanie en connexion avec celle du reste du pays. S.I.G.M.A., Montpellier 70, 1–22.
Wiehe W 1986 Untersuchungen zur Salzrekretion bei ausgewählten Limonium-Arten. Dipl. Thesis Bielefeld, 136 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breckle, SW. (1990). Salinity tolerance of different halophyte types. In: El Bassam, N., Dambroth, M., Loughman, B.C. (eds) Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7421-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2053-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive