Skip to main content

Science and religion

  • Chapter
  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between science and religion has a long history of tensions. When we confine ourselves to Western culture, the first tension arose when in Greece philosophical and scientific explanations began to compete with mythological ones. Usually the latter are called ‘irrational’, whereas the former are considered to be ‘rational’, but that distinction is incorrect. In its own way the mythological explanation is also rational. The real difference between the two kinds of explanation is that myth explained the phenomena by referring to divine activity, whereas science refers to internal and external natural causes. The latter causes, however, could not explain everything. As a result the realm of mythological explanations did not completely disappear, but it became more limited. Perhaps it did not entirely disappear because, at that time, the scientific explanations were de facto deficient, or was this an indication of more fundamental problems?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and note

  1. They are rear-guard actions, not only from the side of fundamentalists, but also from the scientific side. See for example J. Monod, Le hasard et la nécessité, essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne, Éditions du Seuil, Paris 1970

    Google Scholar 

  2. English translation: Chance and Necessity, Collins, London 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compare also E. Schoffeniels, L’anti-hasard, Gauthiers-Villars, Paris 1973; English translation: Anti-chance, Pergamon Press, Oxford 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Kuyper, Calvinism. Six Stone-lectures, Amsterdam-Pretoria 1898, p. 176. T.F. Torrance, theologian, Professor emeritus of Christian dogmatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Melsen, A.G.M. (1990). Science and religion. In: Fennema, J., Paul, I. (eds) Science and Religion. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2021-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2021-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7406-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2021-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics