Abstract
In “Epistemic Compatibilism and Canonical Beliefs” Peter Klein argues that we can’t know much about the world around us, but we can know that most of our ordinary beliefs about the world are true.1 He calls the set of the most obviously true common-sense beliefs about the world around us “the canon”.2 The canon includes beliefs such as that there are tables, there are dogs, and there are trees outside. According to Klein, we can’t know any of the propositions in the canon. About them, skeptics are right. But, contrary to what skeptics assert, we can know a general proposition about these canonical beliefs, namely, that the preponderance of them is true. Let us call this general proposition ‘the meta-proposition’. Thus, on Klein’s view, although we can’t know what we might call “specific facts” about the world, we can know that the meta-proposition is true, i.e., we can know that our general world view is correct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Feldman, R. (1990). Klein on Certainty and Canonical Beliefs. In: Roth, M.D., Ross, G. (eds) Doubting. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1942-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1942-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7367-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1942-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive