Abstract
The chief question in this chapter is when compliance with principles of procedural justice should be legally required. As noted below, both the U.S. Supreme Court and common-law courts confront a version of this issue in applying the constitution and principles of natural justice. However, our question is broader, because it also includes when legislatures should mandate compliance by statute. Indeed, we shall not consider the particular way procedural justice should be legally required—by a constitution, common law, or statutory law. However, common-law courts should generally be able to require compliance in the absence of statutory requirements unless there is a manifest legislative intent not to do so.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bayles, M.D. (1990). The Limits of Law. In: Procedural Justice. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1932-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1932-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7362-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1932-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive