Abstract
One of the most significant results to be derived from studies of this kind concerns the central role of logic in formalizing and understanding different schemes for representing knowledge. Although there are those, such as Minsky, who dispute the suitability of logic for this purpose, their positions tend to derive such plausibility as they possess from focusing upon an extremely limited conception of the logical domain. The field of logic is not restricted to sentential logic, predicate logic, or even enhanced versions of predicate logic, but derives its character from the study of logical form, where “logical form” encompasses every formal property of any semiotic domain that might possibly be theoretically relevant to its semantical and pragmatical properties. [Cf., for example, Prior (1967a) and (1967b), but especially Cargile (1984).] The specific subjects that happen to be pursued by specific students of logic at specific times no doubt reflect matters of current and continuing interest, but the field itself has enduring significance for that of artificial intelligence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fetzer, J.H. (1990). Minds, Bodies, and Machines. In: Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1900-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1900-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-0548-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1900-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive