Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 116))

  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

Frege’s extensional approach to reference affected his understanding of ontology in two ways: 1) it minimized the importance of his distinction between the complete being of objects and the incomplete being of concepts, and 2) it obscured the role of senses as “modes of presentation,” by making it impossible to regard concepts as senses. Let us first situate the analytic interpretation of ontology within its historical context, next review Frege’s comments on the being of concepts and objects more in detail, then discuss the levelling effect of his extensional approach to reference, and finally consider how that approach encouraged reductive interpretations of the meaning of ‘being’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Francis Bacon, On the Dignity and Advancement of Learning, ed. W.A. Wright (London, 1900), III, pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christian Wolff, Philosophia Prima sive Ontologia, ed. J. Ecole ( Hildesheim: Olms, (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy ( New York: Simon & Schuster, 1960 ), pp. 201–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand Russell, The Principles of Mathematics. Second edition (New York: Norton, (1937), p. 449.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertrand Russell, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy ( New York: Simon and Schuster, 1971 ), p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge: Essays 1901–1950. Ed. Robert C. Marsh ( London: Allen & Unwin, 1956 ), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertrand Russell, “On Denoting,” Mind, XIV (1905), 473–93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Willard v. O. Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays ( New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1969 ), pp. 50–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. William Vallicella, “A Critique of the Quantificational Account of Existence,” The Thomist, XLVII (1983), 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Willard v.O. Quine, “A Logistical Approach to the Ontological Problem,” in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, revised ed. ( Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1976 ), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cobb-Stevens, R. (1990). On What There Is. In: Husserl and Analytic Philosophy. Phaenomenologica, vol 116. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1888-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1888-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1888-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics