Skip to main content

Abstract

The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution constitutes a unique and flexible approach to the representation, analysis, and understanding of strategic conflict. This methodology, as implemented in the Decision Support System GMCR, constitutes a useful tool for negotiation support. Because GMCR includes efficient algorithms for calculating the stability of states, it encourages extensive comparisons of the consequences of different models of negotiators’ decision making. GMCR also facilitates modifications to the way in which the conflict is represented, encouraging sensitivity and what-if analyses. The applicability of GMCR to negotiations is discussed in general, and in the context of a specific case study in environmental conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bergmann-Baker, U. (1991). “Groundwater Contamination and the Restoration of a Hazardous Waste Site in Elmira, Ontario—Relevance of Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making.” Master’s thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, SaarbrĂĽcken, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J. (1993). Theory of Moves. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S. J., and D. Wittman (1981). “Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2 Ă— 2 Games,” Conflict Management and Peace Science 6, 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, B. (1991). “Halt Cleanup Deal, Region Says.” Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, November 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, B. (1993). “Deal Made.” Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, March 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K. (1991). “Uniroyal Agrees to Elmira Cleanup.” Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, October 8, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., and C. Thompson (1991). “Region Kept Apprised of Uniroyal Cleanup Talks, Grier Says.” Kitchener-Waterloo Record, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, October 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, and D. M. Kilgour (1989). “Conflict Models in Graph Form: Solution Concepts and Their Interrelationships,” European Journal of Operational Research 41, 86–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., K. W. Hipel, and D. M. Kilgour. (1993). Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. M., and K. W Hipel. (1979). “Solving Complex Conflicts.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. M., and K. W. Hipel. (1984). Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. W, L. Fang, D. M. Kilgour, and M. Haight. (1993a). “Environmental Conflict Resolution Using the Graph Model.” In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17–20, pp. 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipel, K. W, L. Fang, and D. M. Kilgour. (1993b). “Game Theoretic Models in Engineering Decision Making,” Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, Japan Society of Civil Engineers 470/IV-20, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers). (1991). Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, Charlottesville, Virginia, October 13–16, pp. 1978–2022.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE (Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers). (1993). Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17–20, pp. 132–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M. (1984). “Equilibria for Far-sighted Players,” Theory and Decision 16, 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M. (1985). “Anticipation and Stability in Two-person Noncooperative Games.” In M. D. Ward and U Luterbacher (eds.), Dynamic Models of International Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press, pp. 26–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M., L. Fang, and K. W. Hipel. (1994). “The Decision Support System GMCR and the Management of Strategic Uncertainty.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Processing and the Management of Uncertainty, Paris, France, July 4–8, pp. 638–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, D. M., K. W. Hipel, and L. Fang. (1987). “The Graph Model for Conflicts,” Automatica 23(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, M. (1991). “Uniroyal to Do Cleanup.” The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1950). “Equilibrium Points in n-person Games.” Proceedings of National Academy of Science of the U.S.A. 36, 48–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F. (1951). “Noncooperative Games.” Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, K. J., K. W. Hipel, and L. Fang. (1994). “Decision Making under Conditions of Conflict,” Group Decision and Negotiation 3, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A. P. (1991). Decision Support Systems Engineering. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. G., and L. TravĂ©-Massuyès, eds. (1991). “Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning.” Proceedings of the IMACS International Workshop on Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning, Toulouse, France, March 13–15. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 101–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. (1953). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, F. C. (1984). “Limited-move Equilibria in 2 Ă— 2 Games,” Theory and Decision 16, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W. (1996). Negotiation Support Using the Decision Support System GMCR. In: Shakun, M.F. (eds) Negotiation Processes: Modeling Frameworks and Information Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1824-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1824-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1824-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics