Skip to main content

Abstract

This article seeks to examine the insights for practice that can be obtained from the recent work in explicit, extensive-form models of bargaining. I discuss the results of the theory and compare them to the advice often given to practitioners. Also included are sections on criticisms of these models and possible responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. Abreu, and F. Gul. (1994). “Bargaining and Reputation.” Mimeo, Princeton University and Northwestern University, Departments of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Aumann, and A. Brandenburger. (1993). “Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium.” Mimeo, Harvard Business School and Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore. (1985). “Bargaining and Coalitions.” In A. E. Roth (ed.), Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore, A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky. (1986). “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling,” Rand Journal of Economics 17, 176–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Binmore, A. Shaked, and J. Sutton. (1988). “An Outside Option Experiment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 753–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Bolton. (1991). “A Comparative Model of Bargaining: Theory and Evidence.” In American Economic Review (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, and B. Dutta. (1994). “Rubinstein Auctions: On Competition for Bargaining Partners.” Mimeo, Penn State and the Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, B. Dutta, D. Ray, and K. Sengupta. (1993). “A Non-Cooperative Theory of Coalitional Bargaining,” Review of Economic Studies 60, 463–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, and C. C. Lee. (1993). “Bargaining with Incomplete Information about Outside Options.” Mimeo, Penn State and Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, and L. Samuelson. (1987). “Bargaining with Two-Sided Incomplete Information: An Infinite Horizon Model with Alternating Offers,” Review of Economic Studies 54, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, and L. Samuelson. (1990). “Perfect Equilibria in Simultaneous Offers Bargaining,” International Journal of Game Theory 19, 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Chatterjee, and W. Samuelson. (1983). “Bargaining under Incomplete Information,” Operations Research 31, 835–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. D. Chikte, and S. D. Deshmukh. (1987). “The Role of External Search in Bilateral Bargaining,” Operations Research 35, 198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. C. Cramton. (1992). “Strategic Delay in Bargaining under Two-Sided Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Cohen. (1980). You Can Negotiate Anything. Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, Eric, Reinhard Selten, and Eyal Winter. (1990). “Alternating Bid Bargaining with a Smallest Money Unit,” Games and Economic Behavior 2, 188–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Evans. (1989). “Sequential Bargaining with Correlated Values,” Review of Economic Studies 56, 499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Farrell, and R. Gibbons. (1989). “Cheap Talk Can Matter in Bargaining,” Journal of Economic Theory 48, 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Fudenberg, D. Levine, and J. Tirole. (1985). “Infinite Horizon Models of Bargaining with One-Sided Incomplete Information.” in A. E. Roth (ed.), Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Harsanyi. (1956). “Approaches to the Bargaining Problem Before and After the Theory of Games: A Critical Discussion of Zeuthen’s, Hicks’s and Nash’s Theories,” Econometrica 24, 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kreps. (1991). Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • V Krishna. (1991). “Learning in Games with Strategic Complementarities.” Mimeo, Harvard University (now available from Penn State’s Department of Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Lax, and J. Sebenius. (1986). The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. C. Lee. (1993). “Bargaining and Search with Recall,” Operations Research, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. D. Luce, and H. Raiffa. (1957). Games and Decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Milgrom, and J. Roberts. (1990). “Rationalizability, Learning and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities,” Econometrica 58, 1255–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Morris, R. Rob, and H. S. Shin. (1993). “Risk Dominance and Stochastic Potential.” Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Muthoo. (1990). “Bargaining without Commitment,” Games and Economic Behavior 2, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Myerson. (1981). “Optimal Auction Design,” Mathematics of Operations Research, 6, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Myerson, and M. Satterthwaite. (1983). “Efficient Mechanisms for Bilateral Trading,” Journal of Economic Theory 29, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Nash. (1950). “The Bargaining Problem,” Econometrica 18, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Nash. (1953). “Two-Person Cooperative Games,” Econometrica 21, 128–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ochs, and A. E. Roth. (1989). “An Experimental Study of Sequential Bargaining,” American Economic Review 79, 355–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Popper. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Putnam. (1974). “The ‘Corroboration’ of Theories.” In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Raiffa. (1953). “Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two-Person Games.” In H. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Raiffa. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Rosenberg. (1992). Economics-Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rosenschein, and G. Zlotkin. (1994). Rules of Encounter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. E. Roth. (1979). Axiomatic Models of Bargaining. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • W Samuelson. (1984). “Bargaining under Asymmetric Information,” Econometrica 52, 995–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Schelling. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sebenius. (1992). “Negotiation Analysis,” Management Science 38, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten. (1975). “Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games,” International Journal of Game Theory 4, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Selten. (1981). “A Noncooperative Model of Characteristic Function Bargaining.” Reprinted in Models of Strategic Rationality. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Siegel, and L. Fouraker. (1960). Bargaining and Group Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Stahl. (1972). “Bargaining Theory.” Stockholm School of Economics, Economic Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Vincent. (1989). “Bargaining with Common Values,” Journal of Economic Theory. 48, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chatterjee, K. (1996). Game Theory and the Practice of Bargaining. In: Shakun, M.F. (eds) Negotiation Processes: Modeling Frameworks and Information Technology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1824-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1824-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1824-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics