Advertisement

Form and Function in the Molecularization of Biology

  • Sahotra Sarkar
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 182)

Abstract

During the first few decades of this century European art finally discovered the power of formalism which had long been known to many other societies, particularly those of central and southern Africa which Europe, in its colonial frenzy, had scornfully designated as “primitive”.1 The new formalism came to dominate, however briefly, one medium after another, from painting through sculpture to photography and architecture.2 No medium except those that, by convention, necessarily had “a story to tell” was immune to formalism’s invasion and even these, including the novel and the new medium of cinema, did not go completely unscathed. Formalism did not play itself out in exactly the same way in all media. However, what is remarkable is that, from Wassily Kandinsky and Paul Klee in painting, to Le Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe in architecture, early 20th century formalism transcended the differences between media and can be characterized by a few basic ideas.

Keywords

Molecular Biology Genetic Code Formal Element Human Genome Project Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buchsteiner, T., Weston (Schaffhausen: Edition Stemmie, 1989).Google Scholar
  2. Carnap, R., Logical Syntax of Language (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1937).Google Scholar
  3. Close, F., ‘The quark structure of matter’, in P. Davies (ed.), The New Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 396–424.Google Scholar
  4. Crick, F. H. C, Griffith, J. S. and Orgel, L. E., ‘Codes without commas’, Proc. Natl Acad, of Sci. (USA) 43: 416–421, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ephrussi, B., Leopold, U., Watson, J. D. and Weigle, J. J., ‘Terminology in bacterial genetics’, Nature 171: 701, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Focillon, H., La vie des formes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1934).Google Scholar
  7. Focillon, H., The Life of Forms in Art (New York: Zone Books, 1989).Google Scholar
  8. Ford, J., ‘What is chaos, that we should be mindful of it?’, in P. Davies (ed.), The New Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 348–372.Google Scholar
  9. Gamow, G., ‘Possible relation between Deoxyribonucleic Acid and protein structures’, Nature 173: 318, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Georgi, H. M., ‘Grand unified theories’, in P. Davies (ed.), The New Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 425–445.Google Scholar
  11. Jencks, C, Modern Movements in Architecture (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1985).Google Scholar
  12. Kandinsky, W., Point and Line to Plane (New York: Dover, 1979).Google Scholar
  13. Lazaro, G. D. S., Klee (New York: Praeger, 1957).Google Scholar
  14. Leggett, A. J., The Problems of Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  15. Overy, P., De Stijl (London: Thames and Hudson, 1991).Google Scholar
  16. Panofsky, E., Meaning in the Visual Arts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955).Google Scholar
  17. Sarkar, S., ‘On the concept of elementarity in particle physics’, Columbia Journal of Ideas 5(3): 93–129, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Sarkar, S., ‘Reductionism and molecular biology: A reappraisal’, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1989.Google Scholar
  19. Sarkar, S, ‘Models of reduction and categories of reductionism’, Synthese 91: 167–194, 1992a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarkar, S., ‘Para qué sirve el proyecto Genoma Humano’, La Jornade Semanal 180: 29–39, 1992b.Google Scholar
  21. Sarkar, S., ‘Biological information’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 183: 187–231, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Schrödinger, E., What is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944).Google Scholar
  23. Schulze, F., Mies van der Rohe: A Critical Biography (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  24. Scruton, R., The Aesthetics of Architecture (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  25. Shimony, A., ‘The methodology of synthesis: Parts and wholes in low-energy physics’, in R. Kargon and P. Achinstein (ed.), Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987), pp. 399–423.Google Scholar
  26. Shimony, A., ‘Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics’, in P. Davies (ed.), The New Physics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 373–395.Google Scholar
  27. Tauber, A. I. and Sarkar, S., ‘The human genome project: Has blind reductionism gone too far?’, Perspectives on Biology and Medicine 35(2): 220–235, 1992.Google Scholar
  28. Watson, J. D. and Crick, F. H. C., ‘Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid’, Nature 171: 737–738, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whitford, F., Bauhaus (London: Thames and Hudson, 1984).Google Scholar
  30. Whyte, L. L. (ed.) Aspects of Form (London: Lund Humphries, 1951).Google Scholar
  31. Woese, C. R., ‘The genetic code — 1963’, ICSU Review of World Science 5: 210–252, 1963.Google Scholar
  32. Yockey, H. P., Information Theory and Molecular Biology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sahotra Sarkar
    • 1
  1. 1.MITMcGill University and Dibner InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations