Abstract
This is the best description of aesthetic perception of which I am aware. For the scientist, it may be a frustrating one because it contains no measurable properties and no table of values. It is often equally frustrating to the artist, as there is no formula for reaching this perfect moment. However, standards, ideals, and judgment of formal properties have been enlisted over the centuries to try to approximate this vision. It is here that science and art most often intersect in an attempt to achieve this elusive ideal. The abstract expressionist artist Barnett Newman reportedly said that aesthetics was to artists as ornithology is to birds. This apocryphal remark implies that aesthetics is as irrelevant to artists as the study of bird habits is to birds. However, as ornithology studies what birds do, the domain of aesthetics includes what artists do. Newman implied that theory was not essential to artists; their making of art was the important activity. This is an orthodox abstract expressionist tenet, but in fact, theory and aesthetics were extremely important in the making of Newman’s own art. The exact placement and proportions of his vertical bands (or “zips”) on a saturated color field were crucial to the impact and perceptions of his paintings.
In visual art, the aesthetic moment is that flitting instant, so brief as to be almost timeless, when the spectator is at one with the work of art he [/she] is looking at. . . . He [/she] ceases to be his [/her] ordinary self, and the picture or building, statue, landscape, or aesthetic actuality is no longer outside himself [/herself]. The two become one entity; time and space are abolished and the spectator is possessed by one awareness. . . . In short, the aesthetic moment is a moment of mystic vision. Berenson, 1948, pp. 84–85
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahlberg, Lars-Olof, ‘The nature and limits of analytic aesthetics’, British Journal of Aesthetics 32: 5–16, 1993.
Berenson, Bernard, Aesthetics and History in the Visual Arts (New York: Pantheon, 1948).
Berger, John, ‘Another way of telling’, Journal of Social Reconstruction: 64, 1980.
Blanc, Charles, Grammaire des Arts du Dessin, Architecture, Sculpture, Peinture (Paris: Renouard, 1867).
Broude, Norma, Impressionism: A Feminist Reading (New York: Rizzoli International Publications, Inc., 1991).
Chevreul, Michel Eugene, De la Loi du Contraste Simultane des Coleurs (Paris: Chez Pitois-Levraut, 1839).
Coke, Van Deren, The Painter and the Photograph (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, 1986).
Dagognet, Francois, Etienne-Jules Marey: A Passion for the Trace, trans, by Robert Galeta (New York: Zone Books, 1992).
Da Vinci, Leonardo, The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci, ed., and trans, by Edward MacCurdy (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1939).
De Onis, Frederico Antologia de la Proesia Espanola e Hispanoamericana (Madrid: Junta Para Ampliacion de Estudios e Investigaciones Cientificas, 1934).
Devereaux, Mary, ‘Oppressive texts, resisting, readers, and the gendered spectator: The new aesthetics’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48: 338–347, 1990.
Dürer, Albrecht, The Human Figure — The Complete ‘Dresden Sketchbook’, ed. and trans, by Walter L. Strauss (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1972).
Ellis, John, Against Deconstruction (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).
Foster, Hal, Ed. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1991).
Goldman, Alan H., ‘Art historical value’, British Journal of Aesthetics 33: 17–28, 1993.
Greenberg, Clement, ‘Modern and post-modern’, Arts 54 (Feb. 1980).
Jameson, Frederic, ‘Postmodernism and consumer society’, in Hal Foster (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic, pp. 111–125.
Jencks, Charles, What is Post-Modernism? (London: Academy Editions, 1982).
Keller, Alex, ‘Continuity and discontinuity in early 20th century physics and early 20th century painting’, in Martin Pollock (ed.), Common Denominators in Art and Science, pp. 97–106.
King, Elaine A, ‘Art, politics, and ethnicity’, in Kim Levin (ed.), Beyond Walls and Wars (New York: Midmarch, 1992), pp. 104–106.
Levin, David Michael, ‘Postmodernism in dance’, in Hugh J. Silverman (ed.), Postmodernism and Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 207–233.
Lomas, David, ‘Modernism versus postmodernism: Kirk Varnedoe’s 1992 Slade lectures’, Apollo 137: 71–74, 1993.
Marey, E. J., La Machine Animale — Locomotion Terrestre Et Aérienne (Paris: Libraire Germer Bailliére, 1873).
Muybridge, Eadweard, ‘A horse’s motion scientifically determined’, Scientific American 39: 241, 1878.
Muybridge, Eadweard, Animal Locomotion — An Electro-Photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements, 1872–1875 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1887).
Newton, Isaac, ‘New theory of light and colours’, The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 6: 3075, 1671.
Newton, Isaac, Opticks — Or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections, and Colors of Light, Fourth edition (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1952).
Owens, Craig, ‘The discourse of others: feminists and postmodernism’, in Howard Risatti (ed.), Postmodern Perspectives pp. 186–207.
Pollock, Martin (ed.), Common Denominators in Art and Science (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1983).
Risatti, Howard (ed.), Postmodern Perspectives (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1990).
Rood, Ogden, Student’s Textbook of Color — Modern Chromatics with Applications to Art and Industry (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1879).
Rood, Ogden, Théorie Scientifique des Coleurs et Leurs Applications à I’Art et à l’Industrie (Paris: G. Baillière, 1881).
Ruskin, John, The Elements of Drawing, In Three Letters to Beginners (London: Smith, Elder, and Company, 1857).
Said, Edward W., ‘Opponents, audience, constituencies, and community’, in Hal Foster (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1991), pp. 135–159.
Selz, Peter, ‘The Stars and Stripes: Johns to Burkhardt’, in Kim Levin (ed.), Beyond Walls and Wars (New York: Midmarch, 1992), pp. 220–224.
Shlain, Leonard, Art and Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light (New York: William Morrow, 1991).
Signac, Paul, D’Eugène Delacroix au neo-impressionisme. Introduction et notes par Francoise Cachin (Paris: Heinemann, 1978).
Thackera, John (ed.), Design after Modernism (London: Thames and Hudson, 1988).
Toynbee, Arnold J., A Study of History (London, 1935).
Valéry, Paul, Degas, Manet, Morisot, trans, by David Paul (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989).
Vermeule, Cornelius, Polykleitos (Boston: Museum of Fine Arts, 1969).
Waugh, Joanne B., ‘Analytic aesthetics and feminist aesthetics: Neither/nor’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48: 317–326, 1990.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faxon, A.C. (1996). Intersections of Art and Science to Create Aesthetic Perception: The Problem of Postmodernism. In: Tauber, A.I. (eds) The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 182. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1786-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1786-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4763-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1786-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive