Advertisement

Intersections of Art and Science to Create Aesthetic Perception: The Problem of Postmodernism

  • Alicia Craig Faxon
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 182)

Abstract

This is the best description of aesthetic perception of which I am aware. For the scientist, it may be a frustrating one because it contains no measurable properties and no table of values. It is often equally frustrating to the artist, as there is no formula for reaching this perfect moment. However, standards, ideals, and judgment of formal properties have been enlisted over the centuries to try to approximate this vision. It is here that science and art most often intersect in an attempt to achieve this elusive ideal. The abstract expressionist artist Barnett Newman reportedly said that aesthetics was to artists as ornithology is to birds. This apocryphal remark implies that aesthetics is as irrelevant to artists as the study of bird habits is to birds. However, as ornithology studies what birds do, the domain of aesthetics includes what artists do. Newman implied that theory was not essential to artists; their making of art was the important activity. This is an orthodox abstract expressionist tenet, but in fact, theory and aesthetics were extremely important in the making of Newman’s own art. The exact placement and proportions of his vertical bands (or “zips”) on a saturated color field were crucial to the impact and perceptions of his paintings.

Keywords

Aesthetic Experience Color Theory Aesthetic Judgment Aesthetic Perception Aesthetic Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlberg, Lars-Olof, ‘The nature and limits of analytic aesthetics’, British Journal of Aesthetics 32: 5–16, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berenson, Bernard, Aesthetics and History in the Visual Arts (New York: Pantheon, 1948).Google Scholar
  3. Berger, John, ‘Another way of telling’, Journal of Social Reconstruction: 64, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. Blanc, Charles, Grammaire des Arts du Dessin, Architecture, Sculpture, Peinture (Paris: Renouard, 1867).Google Scholar
  5. Broude, Norma, Impressionism: A Feminist Reading (New York: Rizzoli International Publications, Inc., 1991).Google Scholar
  6. Chevreul, Michel Eugene, De la Loi du Contraste Simultane des Coleurs (Paris: Chez Pitois-Levraut, 1839).Google Scholar
  7. Coke, Van Deren, The Painter and the Photograph (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. Dagognet, Francois, Etienne-Jules Marey: A Passion for the Trace, trans, by Robert Galeta (New York: Zone Books, 1992).Google Scholar
  9. Da Vinci, Leonardo, The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci, ed., and trans, by Edward MacCurdy (New York: Reynal and Hitchcock, 1939).Google Scholar
  10. De Onis, Frederico Antologia de la Proesia Espanola e Hispanoamericana (Madrid: Junta Para Ampliacion de Estudios e Investigaciones Cientificas, 1934).Google Scholar
  11. Devereaux, Mary, ‘Oppressive texts, resisting, readers, and the gendered spectator: The new aesthetics’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48: 338–347, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dürer, Albrecht, The Human Figure — The Complete ‘Dresden Sketchbook’, ed. and trans, by Walter L. Strauss (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1972).Google Scholar
  13. Ellis, John, Against Deconstruction (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  14. Foster, Hal, Ed. The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  15. Goldman, Alan H., ‘Art historical value’, British Journal of Aesthetics 33: 17–28, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenberg, Clement, ‘Modern and post-modern’, Arts 54 (Feb. 1980).Google Scholar
  17. Jameson, Frederic, ‘Postmodernism and consumer society’, in Hal Foster (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic, pp. 111–125.Google Scholar
  18. Jencks, Charles, What is Post-Modernism? (London: Academy Editions, 1982).Google Scholar
  19. Keller, Alex, ‘Continuity and discontinuity in early 20th century physics and early 20th century painting’, in Martin Pollock (ed.), Common Denominators in Art and Science, pp. 97–106.Google Scholar
  20. King, Elaine A, ‘Art, politics, and ethnicity’, in Kim Levin (ed.), Beyond Walls and Wars (New York: Midmarch, 1992), pp. 104–106.Google Scholar
  21. Levin, David Michael, ‘Postmodernism in dance’, in Hugh J. Silverman (ed.), Postmodernism and Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 1990), pp. 207–233.Google Scholar
  22. Lomas, David, ‘Modernism versus postmodernism: Kirk Varnedoe’s 1992 Slade lectures’, Apollo 137: 71–74, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. Marey, E. J., La Machine Animale — Locomotion Terrestre Et Aérienne (Paris: Libraire Germer Bailliére, 1873).Google Scholar
  24. Muybridge, Eadweard, ‘A horse’s motion scientifically determined’, Scientific American 39: 241, 1878.Google Scholar
  25. Muybridge, Eadweard, Animal Locomotion — An Electro-Photographic Investigation of Consecutive Phases of Animal Movements, 1872–1875 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1887).Google Scholar
  26. Newton, Isaac, ‘New theory of light and colours’, The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 6: 3075, 1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newton, Isaac, Opticks — Or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections, and Colors of Light, Fourth edition (New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1952).Google Scholar
  28. Owens, Craig, ‘The discourse of others: feminists and postmodernism’, in Howard Risatti (ed.), Postmodern Perspectives pp. 186–207.Google Scholar
  29. Pollock, Martin (ed.), Common Denominators in Art and Science (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  30. Risatti, Howard (ed.), Postmodern Perspectives (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1990).Google Scholar
  31. Rood, Ogden, Student’s Textbook of Color — Modern Chromatics with Applications to Art and Industry (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1879).Google Scholar
  32. Rood, Ogden, Théorie Scientifique des Coleurs et Leurs Applications à I’Art et à l’Industrie (Paris: G. Baillière, 1881).Google Scholar
  33. Ruskin, John, The Elements of Drawing, In Three Letters to Beginners (London: Smith, Elder, and Company, 1857).Google Scholar
  34. Said, Edward W., ‘Opponents, audience, constituencies, and community’, in Hal Foster (ed.), The Anti-Aesthetic. Essays on Postmodern Culture (Seattle: Bay Press, 1991), pp. 135–159.Google Scholar
  35. Selz, Peter, ‘The Stars and Stripes: Johns to Burkhardt’, in Kim Levin (ed.), Beyond Walls and Wars (New York: Midmarch, 1992), pp. 220–224.Google Scholar
  36. Shlain, Leonard, Art and Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time, and Light (New York: William Morrow, 1991).Google Scholar
  37. Signac, Paul, D’Eugène Delacroix au neo-impressionisme. Introduction et notes par Francoise Cachin (Paris: Heinemann, 1978).Google Scholar
  38. Thackera, John (ed.), Design after Modernism (London: Thames and Hudson, 1988).Google Scholar
  39. Toynbee, Arnold J., A Study of History (London, 1935).Google Scholar
  40. Valéry, Paul, Degas, Manet, Morisot, trans, by David Paul (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  41. Vermeule, Cornelius, Polykleitos (Boston: Museum of Fine Arts, 1969).Google Scholar
  42. Waugh, Joanne B., ‘Analytic aesthetics and feminist aesthetics: Neither/nor’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48: 317–326, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alicia Craig Faxon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations