Advertisement

Kant and the Aesthetic-Expressive Vision of Mathematics

  • Leon Chernyak
  • David Kazhdan
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 182)

Abstract

Since Plato, aesthetic experience was understood as the encounter with the self-manifesting (self-expressing) authenticity of being. At the same time, the Western intellectual traditions were inclined to view mathematics as perhaps the purest form of human rationality. Since rationality was viewed as revealing of the authenticity of beings, the unity of mathematical and aesthetic experiences often appeared to philosophers as self-evident.

Keywords

Human Reason Aesthetic Experience Human Rationality Pure Reason Mathematical Text 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Plotinus, The Enneads. I, 6, 6.Google Scholar
  2. [2]a
    Heidegger, M., ‘Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes’, Holzwege, 2nd. ed. (Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1952), pp. 7–68.Google Scholar
  3. [2]b
    Heidegger, M.‘The origin of the work of art’, in M. Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans, by A. Hofstadter (New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, London: Harper, 1975), pp. 15–87.Google Scholar
  4. [3]
    Heidegger, M., Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, trans, by James S. Churchill (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962), pp. 226–238.Google Scholar
  5. [4]
    Heidegger, M., ‘Die Zeit des Weltbildes’ (The age of the world as view), in Holzwege (Frankfurt a.M.: V. Klostermann, 1953), pp. 69–105, English trans, by Marjorie Grene, Measure, II, 1951, pp. 269–284.Google Scholar
  6. [5]
    Akhutin, A. V., Istoria Principov Fizicheskogo Experimenta: Ot Antichnosty do 17 Veka (History of the Principles of Experimentation in Physics: from Antiquity to 17th century) (Moscow: Nauka, 1976).Google Scholar
  7. [6]
    Bibler, V. S., ‘Galilei i logika myshleniay novogo vremeni’ (Galileo and the logic of thinking of modernity), in Mekhanika i Tsivilizatsiya 17–18 vekov (Mechanics and the Civilization of the 17th-18th centuries) (Moscow: Nauka, 1979), pp. 448–518, Bibler, V. S., ‘Kant i logika eksperimenta’ (Kant and the logic of experiment), Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki, 1987, 1.Google Scholar
  8. [7]
    Merleau-Ponty, M., Signs, trans, by Richard C. McCleary (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1964), p. 84.Google Scholar
  9. [8]
    Lenoir, T., The Strategy of Life. Teleology and Mechanics in Nineteenth Century German Biology (Dordrecht/Boston/London: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1982).Google Scholar
  10. [9]
    Heidegger, M, ‘Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes’, p. 74.Google Scholar
  11. [10]
    Kant, L.,Metaphysische Anfangsgruende der Naturwissenschaft, Vorrede, in Kant Werke (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1975), Bd. 8, p. 14.Google Scholar
  12. [11]
    Kline, M., Mathematics. The Loss of Certainty (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980), p. 341.Google Scholar
  13. [12]
    Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, trans, and ed. by F. M. Mueller (London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1934), p. 572.Google Scholar
  14. [13]
    Carnap, R., The Logical Structure of the World; Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, trans. by Rolf A. George (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  15. [14]
    Goodman, N., Ways of Worldmaking (Indianopolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1978).Google Scholar
  16. [15]
    Kant, I., Critique of Pure Reason, trans, and ed. by F. M. Mueller (London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1934), pp. 572–592.Google Scholar
  17. [16]
    Lachterman, D. R., The Ethics of Geometry. A Genealogy of Modernity (New York, London: Routledge, 1989), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  18. [17]
    Cohen, P. J., Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis (New York: W. A. Benjamin, 1966), p. 1.Google Scholar
  19. [18]
    Kant, I., Opus Postumum, Engl, trans, by E. Foerster and M. Rosen, ed. by E. Foerster (Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 139. Chapter 11(251,271-273)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Chernyak
  • David Kazhdan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations