Abstract
The morning after giving an invited lecture on the socially constructed nature of scientific knowledge, I had the privilege of watching as a STM (scanning tunneling microscope) operator zoomed in on a sample of graphite, and as we approached a scale of thousands of nanometers… hundreds of nanometers… tens of nanometers… down to fractions of a nanometer, individual carbon atoms were imaged before our very eyes. The experience was so sublime that it sent chills through my body — and I stood there, a theoretical physicist who, like most of my kind, rarely ventures into the basements of physics buildings experimental colleagues call “home”, conscious that this was one of those life moments when the amorphous jumble of history seems to crystallize in a single instant. How many times had I recounted for my students the evidence for the existence of atoms? And there they were — just the right size and grouped in a hexagonal structure with the interatomic spacings as predicted by theory! “If only Einstein, Rutherford, Bohr, and especially Mach, could have seen this!” I found myself exclaiming.
Because truths we don’t suspect have a hard time making themselves felt, as when thirteen species of whiptail lizards composed entirely of females stay undiscovered due to bias against such things existing, we have to meet the universe halfway. Nothing will unfold for us unless we move toward what looks to us like nothing: faith is a cascade. The sky’s high solid is anything but, the sun going under hasn’t budged, and if death divests the self it’s the sole event in nature that’s exactly what it seems.
[From the poem “Cascade Experiment”, by Alice Fulton (Fulton, 1990)]
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, David Z.: 1992,Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anzaldúa, Gloria: 1987,Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Book Co.
Barad, Karen: 1995, ‘A Feminist Approach to Teaching Quantum Physics’, in Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering, edited by Sue V. Rosser. NY: Teachers College Press.
Barad, Karen: 1996, ‘Getting Real: Technologies of Embodiment and Materiality’, keynote address, Gender, Technology, Place Conference, Rutgers University, March 30, 1996.
Barad, Karen: forthcoming,Meeting the Universe Halfway, Book Manuscript.
Bernstein, Richard J.: 1983,Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Phila: U. of Penn. Press.
Bohm, David.: 1985, ‘On Bohr’s Views Concerning Quantum Theory’, in Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume, ed. French, A. P. and Kennedy, P. J. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press.
Bohr, Niels: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’,Physical Review, 48, 696–702.
Bohr, Niels: 1937, ‘Causality and Complementarity’,Philosophy of Science, 4.
Bohr, Niels: 1949, ‘Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics’, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. A. Schilpp. Evanston: Northwestern U. Press.
Bohr, Niels: 1963a,The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. I: Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Woodbridge, Conn: Ox Bow Press.
Bohr, Niels: 1963b,The Philosophical Writings Of Niels Bohr, Vol. II: Essays 1933–1957 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Woodbridge, Conn: Ox Bow Press.
Bohr, Niels: 1963c,The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. III: Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Woodbridge, Conn: Ox Bow Press.
Cartwnght, Nancy: 1983,How the Laws of Physics Lie. New York: Clarendon Press.
Cushing, James T.: 1994. Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’ Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
Feyerabend, P. K.: 1962, ‘Problems in Microphysics’, in Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, ed. Robert G. Colodny. Pittsburgh: U. of Pitt.
Fine, Arthur: 1984, ‘The Natural Ontological Attitude’, in Scientific Realism, ed. by J. Leplin. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Folse, Henry: 1985,The Philosophy of Niels Bohr: The Framework of Complementarity. NY: North-Holland.
Fulton, Alice: 1990,Powers of Congress. Boston: David R. Godine.
Galison, Peter: 1987,How Experiments End. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grahn, Judy: 1989,Really Reading Gertrude Stein, Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
Hacking, Ian: 1982, ‘Experimentation and Scientific Realism’,Philosophical Topics, 13, 71–87.
Haraway, Donna: 1985, ‘Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’,Socialist Review, 80, 65–108, (reprinted in Haraway, 1991).
Haraway, Donna: 1988, ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective’,Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599, (reprinted in Haraway, 1991).
Haraway, Donna: 1991,Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. NY: Routledge Press.
Harding, Sandra: 1990, ‘Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critiques’, in Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Linda J. Nicholson. NY: Routledge.
Haraway, Donna: 1991,Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Haraway, Donna (editor): 1993,The “Racial” Economy of Science: Towards A Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hayles, N. Katherine: 1993, ‘Constrained Constructivism: Locating Scientific Inquiry in the Theater of Representation’, in Realism and Representation: Essays on the Problem of Realism in Relation to Science, Literature, and Culture, ed. by George Levin. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Honner, John: 1987,The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hooker, Clifford A.: 1972, ‘The Nature of Quantum Mechanical Reality’, in Paradigms and Paradoxes, ed. R. G. Colodny, Pittsburgh: U. of Pittsburgh Press.
Keller, Evelyn Fox: 1977, ‘The Anomaly of a Woman in Physics’, in Working It Out, ed. Ruddick and Daniels.
Haraway, Donna: 1985,Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale U. Press.
Kondo, Dorinne: 1989,Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a Japanese Workplace. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
Latour, Bruno: 1993,We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laudan, Larry: 1981, ‘A Confutation of Convergent Realism’,Philosophy of Science, 48, 19–48.
Longino, Helen: 1990,Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
Murdoch, Dugald: 1987,Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. NY: Cambridge U. Press.
Pais, Abraham: 1982, ‘Subtle is the Lord…’: The Science and Life of Albert Einstein. NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Petersen, Aage: 1985, ‘The Philosophy of Niels Bohr’, in Niels Bohr: A Centenary Volume, ed. French, A. P., and Kennedy, P. J. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press.
Pickering, Andrew: 1984,Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pickering, Andrew: 1994, ‘After Representation: Science Studies in the Performative Idiom’. Talk given at the Philosophy of Science Association Annual Meeting New Orleans, 14–16 October, 1994.
Rosenfeld, Leon (general ed.): 1972—,Collected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sandoval, Cheyla: 1991, ‘U.S. Third World Feminism: The Theory and Method of Oppositional Consciousness in the Postmodern World.’ Genders, 10.
Scully, Marian O., Englert, Berthold-Georg, and Walther, Herbert: 1991, ‘Quantum Opical Tests of Complementarity’,Nature, 351, 111–116.
Traweek, Sharon: 1988,Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard U. Press.
Winterson, Jeanette: 1992,Written on the Body. NY: Vintage Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Realism and Social Constructivism without Contradiction. In: Nelson, L.H., Nelson, J. (eds) Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Synthese Library, vol 256. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1742-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-4611-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1742-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive