Abstract
Over the last decade or so ethnobotany has assumed a scientific prominence previously denied it. It is endorsed by institutions with a high international profile (Kew, the Royal Geographical Society, WWF, UNDP, UNESCO), has a market value placed upon it by foresters, agronomists, development advisers and pharmacologists, and has become pivotal in preserving the cultural identity and knowledge of indigenous peoples whose traditional way of life is under threat (Posey 1990). Ethnobotanical knowledge has, therefore, become both economic commodity and political slogan. This is particularly true with respect to the plant knowledge of rainforest peoples, as these peoples are often those with the highest media profile. However, in our eagerness to exploit a product and to demonstrate its usefulness, there has been a tendency to oversimplify what ethnobotany entails and just how it can be useful. I argue in this paper that we must not be narrow-minded or simplistic in our conception of ethnobotanical knowledge, and that to take anything less than a broad culturally-contextualised approach may miss the point of the relevance of indigenous knowledge altogether.
Keywords
- Indigenous People
- Indigenous Knowledge
- Tropical Rainforest
- Ethnobotanical Knowledge
- Subsistence Practice
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
ALCORN, J.B. 1981a. Factors influencing botanical resource perception among the Huastec: suggestions for future ethnobotanical enquiry. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:221–230.
ALCORN, J. B. 1981b. Huastec noncrop resource management: implications for prehistoric rainforest management. Human Ecology 9:395–417.
BARRAU, J. (n.d.). An ethnobotanical guide for anthropological research in Malayo-Oceania. UNESCO Science Cooperation Office for Southeast Asia, (Paris).
BERLIN, B., BREEDLOVE, D. & RAVEN P. 1974. Principles of Tzeltal plant classification: an introduction to the botanical ethnography of a Mayan-speaking people of the highland Chiapas. Academic Press, New York.
BROWN, C. H. 1985. Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Current Anthropology 26:43–53.
BROWN, K. 1992. Medicinal plants, indigenous medicine and conservation of biodiversity in Ghana (GEC 92–36).Norwich: CSERGE Working Papers, UEA.
BULMER, R. N. H. 1974. Folk biology in the New Guinea Highlands. Social Science Information 13:9–28.
BURKILL, T. H. 1935. A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay peninsula (2 volumes). Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.
CARNEIRO, R. 1978. The knowledge and use of rainforest trees by the Kuikuru Indians of central Brazil. In Ford, R.I. (ed.). The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropological Papers 67, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
CARNEIRO, R.L. 1988. Indians of the Amazonian forest. In Denslow, J. S. and Padoch, C. (eds). People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.
CARTER, G.F. 1950. Ecology-Geography-Ethnobotany. Scientific Monthly 70:73–80.
CONKLIN, H.C. 1954. The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
CONKLIN, H.C. 1957. Hanunóo agriculture, a report on an integral system of shifting cultivation in the Philippines. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
CONKLIN, H.C. 1972. Folk classification: a topically arranged bibliography of contemporary and background reference through 1971. Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
DENSLOW, J. and PADOCH, C. (eds) 1988. People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.
DOVE, M.R. 1983a. Forest preference in swidden agriculture. Tropical Ecology 24:122–142.
DOVE, M.R. 1983b. Theories of swidden agriculture and the political economy of ignorance. Agroforestry Systems 1:85–99.
DUNN, F.L. 1975. Rainforest collectors and traders: a study of resource utilization in modern and ancient Malaya. Monographs of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 5.
ELLEN, R.F. 1982. Environment, subsistence and system: The ecology of small-scale social informations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
ELLEN, R.F. 1985. Patterns of indigenous timber extraction from Moluccan rain forest fringes. Journal of Biogeography 12:559–587.
ELLEN, R.F. 1986. What Black Elk left unsaid: on the illusory images of Green primitivism. Anthropology Today 2:8–12.
ELLEN, R.F. 1993. Rhetoric, practice and incentive in the face of the changing times: a case study of Nuaulu attitudes to conservation and deforestation. In Milton, K. (ed.). Environmentalism: the view from anthropology. ASA Monograph 32. Routledge, London.
FORD, R.I. 1978. Ethnobotany: historical diversity and synthesis. In Ford, R.I. (ed.). The nature and status of ethnobotany. Anthropological Papers 67. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
FOX, R.B. 1952. The Pinatubo Negritos: their useful plants and material culture. Philippine Journal of Science 81:173–414.
FREEMAN, J.D. 1970. Report on the Iban. LSE Monographs 41. Athlone, London.
FRIEDBERG, C. 1990. Le Savoir Botanique des Bunaq. Percevoir et Classer dans le Haut Lamaknen (Timor, Indonésie). Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Botanique 32. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.
HAYS, T. E. 1974. Mauna: Explorations in Ndumba ethnobotany. Ph-D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
HAYS, T. E. 1982. Utilitarian/adaptationist explanations of folk biological classification: some cautionary notes. Journal of Ethnobiology 2: 89–94.
HEADLAND, T. N. 1987. The wild yam question: how well could independent hunter-gatherers live in a tropical rainforest ecosystem. Human Ecology 15: 463–492.
HOFFMAN, C. 1984. Punan foragers in the trading networks of southeast Asia. In Schrire C. (ed.). Past and present in hunter-gatherer studies. Academic, London.
ICHIKAWA, M. 1992. Traditional use of tropical rainforest by the Mbuti hunter-gatherers in Africa. Pp. 305–317 in Itoigawa, N., Sugiyama, Y., Sackett, G. P. and Thompson, R. K. R. (eds). Topics in primatology: behaviour, ecology and conservation. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
JONES, V. H. 1941. The nature and scope of ethnobotany. Chronica Botanica 6:219–21.
MORAUTA, L., PERNETRA, J. and HEANEY, W. (eds) 1982. Traditional conservation in Papua New Guinea: implications for today (Monograph 16). Institute for Applied Social and Economic Research, Papua New Guinea.
PETERS, C. M., GENTRY, A. H. and MENDELSOHN, R. O. 1989. Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. Nature 339: 665–6.
POSEY, D. 1988. Kayapó Indian natural-resource management. In Denslow, J. S. and Padoch, C. (eds). People of the tropical rainforest. University of California Press, Berkeley.
POSEY, D. A. 1990. Intellectual property rights: what is the position of ethnobiology? Journal of Ethnobiology 10: 93–98.
RAMBO, A. T. 1985. Primitive polluters: Semang impact on the Malaysian tropical rainforest ecosystem. Anthropological Papers 76, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
REICHEL-DOLMATOFF, G. 1976. Cosmology as ecological analysis: a view from the rain forest. Man (N.S.) 11: 307–318.
REVEL, N. 1990. Fleurs de Paroles: Histoire Naturelle Palawan. Volumes I and 2. Peeters/SELAF, Paris.
RICHARDS, P. 1979. Community environmental knowledge and African rural development. IDS Bulletin 10: 28–36.
RICHARDS, P. 1985. Indigenous agricultural revolution: ecology and food production in west Africa. Hutchinson, London.
RICHARDS, P. 1992. Saving the rain forest? Contested futures in conservation. In Wallman, S. (ed.). Contemporary fixtures: perspectives from social anthropology. ASA Monographs 30. Routledge, London.
RICHARDS, P. 1993. Natural symbols and natural history. In Milton, K. (ed.). Environmentalism: the view from anthropology. ASA Monograph 32. Routledge, London.
SHIRLEY, P. 1991. Recovery and utilisation of ethnobotanical knowledge: the Rio Capim, Eastern Amazonia. Final Report: Ethnobotanical exchange between Asia and Amazonia. UNDP, New York.
TELBAN, B. 1988. The role of medical ethnobotany in ethnomedicine: a New Guinea example. Journal of Ethnobiology 8: 149–169.
VAYDA, A. P. 1983. Progressive contextualization: methods for research in human ecology. Human Ecology 11: 265–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ellen, R. (1996). Putting plants in their place: Anthropological approaches to understanding the ethnobotanical knowledge of rainforest populations. In: Edwards, D.S., Booth, W.E., Choy, S.C. (eds) Tropical Rainforest Research — Current Issues. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1685-2_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1685-2_45
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7255-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1685-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive