Abstract
Ecological regionalization according to the USDA Forest Service National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units was undertaken for the New England-New York region. A top-down, map-overlay approach was used to map sections and subsections. Where available, landscape level units (LTAs) were aggregated and evaluated to supplement the subsection mapping. A regional collaborative effort was undertaken to counterbalance the shortfalls of a purely mechanistic approach. As a result of this process, 17 section and 58 draft subsection units were delineated for the New England-New York region. The sub-regional units developed reflect the strong correspondence among climate, topography and geography at this scale. Geologic factors, due to their influence on landform and mineral availability, are also reflected in the ecological unit boundaries. Efforts to apply the multifactor model at the sub-regional level have been hampered by the lack of scale appropriate information on a number of factors particularly meso-scale climate and potential natural community composition and distribution. Further research and investigation are required before these criterion are adequately met.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, C.C., Burns, G.P., Hankinson, T.L., Moore, B. and Taylor, N.: 1920, ‘Plants and animals of Mount Marcy, New York, Parts I, II, and III’, Ecology 1, 71–94, 204–233, 274–288.
Albert, D.A., Denton, S.D. and Barnes, B.V.: 1986, ‘Regional landscape ecosystems of Michigan’, University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Avers P.E., Cleland, D.T., McNab, W.H., Jensen, M.E., Bailey, R.G., King, T., Goudey, C.B. and Russell, W.E.: 1994, ‘National hierarchical framework of ecological units’, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC, 15 pp.
Bailey, R.G.: 1985, ‘Description of the ecoregions of the United States (2nd ed.)’, Miscell. Publ. No. 1391 (revised), US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC.
Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T. and McNab, W.H. (eds.): 1994, ‘Ecoregions and subregions of the United States’, Map at 1:7 500 000 scale, US Geol. Surv., Washington, DC.
Bray, W.L.: 1915, ‘The development of the vegetation of New York State’, Tech. Publ. No. 3, New York State College of Forestry, Syracuse, New York, 186 pp.
Cogbill, C.V. and White, P.S.: 1991, ‘The latitude-elevation relationship for spruce-fir forest and treeline along the Appalachian Mountain chain’, Vegetatio 94, 153–175.
Driscoll, R.S. and others: 1984, ‘An ecological land classification framework for the United States’, Misc. Publ. No. 1439, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC, 56 pp.
Fincher, J.M. and Smith, M.L.: 1994, ‘A discriminant function approach to ecological site classification in northern New England’, Res. Pap. NE-686, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Durham, New Hampshire, 12 pp.
Foster, D.R., Zebryk, T.M.: 1993, ‘Long term vegetation dynamics and disturbance history of a Tsuga dominated forest in New England’, Ecology 74(4), 982–998.
Gallant, A., Whittier, T.R., Larsen, D.P., Omernik, J.M. and Hughes, R.M.: 1989, ‘Regionalization as a tool for managing environmental resources’, Rep. No. EPA/600 3–89/060, US Environ. Protect. Agency, Environ. Res. Lab., Corvallis, Oregon, 152 pp.
Hazard, H.E.: 1937, ‘Plant indicators of pure white pine sites in southern New Hampshire’, Journal of Forestry 35, 477–486.
Heimberger, G.C.: 1934, ‘Forest types studies in the Adirondack region’, Mem. No. 165, Cornell University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca, New York, 122 pp.
Jensen, M.C., McNicoll, C. and Prather, M.: 1991, ‘Application of ecological classification to environmental effects analysis’, Journal of Environmental Quality 20, 24–30.
Jordan, J.K.: 1982, ‘Application of an integrated land classification’, In: Proceedings Artificial Regeneration of Conifers in the Upper Lakes Region, pp. 65–82.
Klijn, F. and Udo de Haes, H.A.: 1994, ‘A hierarchical approach to ecosystems and its implications for ecological land classification’, Landscape Ecology 9(2), 89–104.
Leak, W.B.: 1982, ‘Habitat mapping and interpretation in New England’, Res. Pap. No. NE-496, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Broomall, Pennsylvannia, 28 pp.
Lorimer, C.G.: 1977, ‘The presettlement forest and natural disturbance cycle of northeastern Maine’, Ecology 58, 139–148.
McNab, W.H. and Avers, P.E., (eds.): 1994, ‘Ecological subregions of the United States, part one: sections’, Rep. No. WO-WSA-5, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Washington, DC, 337 pp.
Nichols, G.E.: 1918, ‘The vegetation of northern Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia’, Trans. Connecticut Academy of Arts & Science 22, 79–98.
Post, B.W. and Curtis, R.O.: 1970, ‘Estimation of northern hardwood site index from soils and topography on the Green Mountains of Vermont’, Bull. No. 664, Vermont Agric. Exper. Station, Burlington, Vermont, 16 pp.
Rowe, J.S.: 1980, ‘The common denominator in land classification in Canada: an ecological approach to mapping’, Forestry Chronicle 56, 19–20.
Rowe, J.S.: 1992, ‘The ecosystem approach to forest management’, Forestry Chronicle 68, 222–224.
Smith, M.L.: 1995, ‘Community and edaphic analysis of upland northern hardwood communities, central Vermont, USA’, Forest Ecology and Management 72, 235–249.
Stanley, O.B.: 1938, ‘Indicator significance of lesser vegetation in the Yale Forest near Keene, New Hampshire’, Ecology 19, 188–207.
Tuckerman, E.: 1860, ‘The vegetation of the White Mountains’, In: T.S. King (ed.), The White Hills: Their Legends, Landscape, and Poetry, Crosby, Nichols, Lee & Co., Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 230–241.
Wertz, W.A. and Arnold, J.A.: 1972, ‘Land Systems Inventory’, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Ogden, Utah.
Westveld, M.: 1954, ‘Use of plant indicators as an index of site quality’, Stat. Pap. No. 69, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Upper Darby, Pennsylvannia, 5 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, ML., Carpenter, C. (1996). Application of the USDA Forest Service National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units at the Sub-Regional Level: The New England-New York Example. In: Sims, R.A., Corns, I.G.W., Klinka, K. (eds) Global to Local: Ecological Land Classification. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1653-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1653-1_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7239-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1653-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive