Skip to main content

Quantifying Dialect Mutual Intelligibility

  • Chapter
New Horizons in Chinese Linguistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 36))

Abstract

As students of language we were often asked: ‘How different are Chinese dialects?’ In the past, our standard answer to questions of this sort was to give a classification of the dialects. For example, we would say that Beijing belongs to Mandarin and Xiamen belongs to Southern Min. To a layman, that answer did not make much sense. So the follow-up question was usually the following: ‘Are they mutually intelligible?’ At that point, we were as lost as the layman. How could we talk about dialect similarity and mutual intelligibility?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beijing University: 1962, Hanyu Fangyin Zihui [A Lexicon of Chinese Dialects], Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing University: 1989, Hanyu Fangyin Zihui [A Lexicon of Chinese Dialects], Second Edition, Beijing: Wenzi Gaige Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1982, ‘A quantification of Chinese dialect affinity’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12 (1), 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1986, Quantifying Affinity Among Chinese Dialects, Language Learning Laboratory Technical Report LLL-T-10-86, Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1987, ‘A quantification of Chinese dialect affinity’, in Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong (ed.), Wang Li Memorial Volumes English Volume, Hong Kong: Joint Publishing, pp. 73–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1988, ‘Hanyu fangyan qinshu guanxi de jiliang yanjiu’ [Quantitative studies of Chinese dialect affinity], Zhongguo Yuwen 203, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1990, ‘Syllable-based dialect classification and mutual intelligibility’, paper presented at the First International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1991, ‘Quantifying affinity among Chinese dialects’, in William S.-Y. Wang (ed.), Languages and Dialects of China, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph 3, pp. 77–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1992, ‘Syllable-based dialect classification and mutual intelligibility’, Chinese Languages and Linguistics Symposium Series Number 2, Institute of History and Philology, Taipei, Taiwan: Academia Sinica, pp. 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1994, ‘Hanyu fangyan goutongdu de jisuan’ [Calculation of Chinese dialectal mutual intelligibility], Zhonguo Yuwen 238, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, Mones E. (ed.): 1977, Speech Intelligibility and Speaker Recognition, Stoudsburg, Pennsylvania: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickerson, Harold, Turner, Glen D., and Hickerson, Nancy P.: 1952, ‘Testing procedures for estimating transfer of information among Iroquois dialects and languages’, International Journal of American Linguistics 18, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. and Chretien, C. D.: 1937 ‘Quantitative classification of Indo-European languages’, Language 13, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Zhiji: 1986, ‘Cluster analysis of associations among dialects in Fujian Province’, Yuyan Yanjiu 2, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Zhiji: 1991, A Quantitative Model in Dialect Subgrouping: The Case of Modern Wu Dialects, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Zhiji and Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1985, ‘Chinese dialect affinity based on syllable initials’, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 15.(2), 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Xiwen: 1989, ‘Bijiao fangyanxue zhong de jiliang fangfa’ [Quantitative methods in comparative dialectology], Zhongguo Yuwen 212, 348–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Molly, Tierney, Joseph, and Boyle, Mary E. T.: 1990, ‘The intelligibility of natural and LPC-vocoded words and sentences presented to native and non-native speakers of English’, MIT Lincoln Laboratory Technical Report 869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountain, Joanna L., Wang, William S.-Y., Du, Ruofu, Yuan, Yida, and Cavalli-Sforza, L. Luca: 1992, ‘Congruence of genetic and linguistic evolution in China’, Journal of Chinese Linguistics 20, 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura, Mieko: 1990, Dynamic Dialectology: A Study of Language in Time and Space, Tokyo: Kenkyusha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Joe E.: 1952, ‘Dialect distance testing in Algonquian’, International Journal of American Linguistics 18, 208–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, David W. and Spicer, John L.: 1952, ‘Correlation methods of comparing idiolects in a transition area’, Language 28, 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Wen-Chiu and Cheng, Chin-Chuan: 1991, ‘A Linguistic classification of Rukai Formosan’, Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, Carl F. and Harris, Zellig S.: 1951, ‘Methods for determining intelligibility among dialects of natural languages’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 95, 322–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voiers, William D.: 1977, ‘Diagnostic evaluation of speech intelligibility’, in Mones E. Hawley (ed.), Speech Intelligibility and Speaker Recognition, Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, pp. 374–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, William S.-Y.: 1987, ‘Representing language relationships’, in Henry Hoenigswald and Linda Wiener (eds.), Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, William S.-Y. (ed.): 1991, Languages and Dialects of China, Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, William S.-Y. and Shen, Zhongwei: 1992, ‘Fangyan guanxi de jiliang biaoshu’ [A quantitative description of the relationship among Chinese dialects], Zhongguo Yuwen 227, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Yude: 1960, ‘Chugokugo dai hogen no bunretsu nendai no gengo nendai gakuteki shitan’ [Lexicostatistic estimation of time depths of five major Chinese dialects], Gengo Kenkyu 38, 33–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupan, Jure: 1982, Clustering of Large Data Set, Chichester, New York: Research Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheng, CC. (1996). Quantifying Dialect Mutual Intelligibility. In: Huang, CT.J., Li, Yh.A. (eds) New Horizons in Chinese Linguistics. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3868-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1608-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics