Skip to main content

Summary and Discussion

  • Chapter
Computational Psycholinguistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics ((SITP,volume 20))

Abstract

This book has undertaken the development of a model of human linguistic performance which integrates three fundamental assumptions: (189)

  • Principle-based: The HSPM uses the principles of grammar directly, and processing strategies are defined with respect to the grammar.

  • Incrementality: There is a global demand for maximal, incremental comprehension which must be met by the sentence processor.

  • Modularity: Partitioning of informational/representational domains into modules facilitates speed of processing via distributed, concurrent operation. This is a paradigm for process organisation to be invoked whenever possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Note, this contrasts with the sort of serial modularity refuted by Crain and Steedman, where they assumed that modules operated in a sequential manner (not concurrently) and that information could only flow in units of structure such as clauses or phrases (Crain & Steedman 1985). We would similarly argue against such a version of modularity, since the serial assumption results in no performance benefit, and the units of structure they stipulate simply slow things down, inhibit incrementality and in no way contribute to the modular status.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It should perhaps be made clear that we are using the PAD perspective purely metaphorically. As Johnson also points out (Johnson 1989), we do not mean to say that people actually possess some logical representation of the principles of grammar. We are simply assuming that the knowledge is somehow represented in the innate system, either as a declarative ‘facts’ or possibly embedded within processing machinery.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crocker, M.W. (1996). Summary and Discussion. In: Computational Psycholinguistics. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1600-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1600-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-3806-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1600-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics