Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Handbook of Mathematics Education pp 289–325Cite as

Functions and Calculus

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Kluwer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 4))

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the changing perceptions of functions and calculus in recent years, both in terms of research into cognitive development of concepts and curriculum developments using computer technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   789.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramovich, S.: 1995, ‘Technology for Deciding the Convergence of Series’, International Journal of Mathematical Education for Science and Technology 26 (3), 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.D., & Loftsgaarden, D.: 1987, ‘A Special Calculus Survey: Preliminary Report’, in L. A. Steen (ed.), Calculus for a New Century: A Pump Not a Filter, MAA Notes 8, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 1987, 215–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artigue, M. & Ervynck, G. (eds.): 1993, Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakar, M.: 1993, What Do Students Learn About Function? A Cross-cultural Study in England and Malaysia. Unpublished thesis, University of Warwick, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakar, M & Tall, D.O.: 1992, ‘Students’ Mental Prototypes for Functions and Graphs’, International Journal for Mathematics Education in Science and Technology 23 (1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M.: 1988, ‘Understanding the Function Concept: Some Results of Interviews with Secondary and Tertiary Students’, Research on Mathematics Education in Australia, 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M.: 1991, Investigating change: An introduction to calculus for Australian schools, Victoria, Australia: Publ. Curriculum Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, C: 1993, ‘Renovation in the calculus curriculum, a United States perspective’. In M. Artigue & G. Ervynck (eds.), Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boers, M, & Jones, P.: 1993, ‘Graphics calculators and calculus: Impact on student attitude and practice’. In M. Artigue & G. Ervynck (eds.), Proceedings of the Working Group 3 on Students’Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breidenbach, D. E., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J. & Nichols, D.: 1992, ‘Development of the process conception of function’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 23, 247–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Porta, H., & Uhl, J. J.: 1990, ‘Calculus and Mathematica’. In T. W. Tucker (ed.) Priming the Calculus Pump: Innovations and Resources, MAA Notes 17,. (pp. 101–120). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Porta, H., & Uhl, J.J.: 1991a, ‘Calculus and Mathematica: A Laboratory Course for Learning by Doing’. In L.C. Leinbach et al. (eds.) The Laboratory Approach to Teaching Calculus, MAA Notes 20 (pp.99–110). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., Porta, H., & Uhl, J.J.: 1991b, ‘Lightly Edited Samples of Student Writing in Calculus and Mathematica’. In L.C. Leinbach et al. (eds.), The Laboratory Approach to Teaching Calculus, MAA Notes 20 (pp.189–196). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. H.: 1995, ‘Assessment and graphing calculators’. In L. Lum (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.99–105). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J.: 1992, Function Probe, [Macintosh software] Santa Barbara CA: Intellimation Library for the Macintosh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornu, B.: 1992, ‘Limits’, In D. O. Tall (ed.), Advanced Mathematical Thinking, (pp.153–166), Kluwer: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coston, Y. M.: 1995, ‘The effect of a graphics calculator enhanced college algebra curriculum and cooperative learning on mathematics achievement and attitude’. In L. Lum (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.460–466). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingenbdorf, K., Thomas, K. & Vidakovic, D. (to appear). ‘Understanding the limit concept: beginning with a coordinated process schema’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulombe, W.N. & Mathews, D.: 1995, ‘A comparative study of mathematics courses with computer and non-computer laboratories’. In L. Lum (ed.) Proceedings of the Sixth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.467–473). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, R.H. & Prosser, R.T.: 1991, ‘Computers with Calculus at Dartmouth’, Primus 1 2, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuoco, A.A.: 1994, ‘Multiple Representations for Functions’. In E. Dubinsdky, A. H. Schoenfeld & J. Kaput (eds.), Research Issues in Undergraduate Mathematics Learning, MAA Notes 33, (pp.121–140). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. Porta, H. & Uhl, J.: 1994, ‘Calculus & Mathematica: addressing fundamental questions about technology’. In L. Lum (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.305–314). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, R. G. (ed.): 1986, Towards a Lean and Lively Calculus, MAA Notes 6. Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus T. & Eisenberg T.: 1987, On visualizing function transformations. Technical Report, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus T. & Vinner, S.: 1982, ‘Some aspects of the function concept in college students and junior high school teachers’, Proceeding of the Sixth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Antwerp, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E.: 1991, ‘Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking’. In D.O. Tall (ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer: Dordrecht, 95–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E.: 1992, ‘A Learning Theory Approach to Calculus’. In Z.A. Karian (ed.) Symbolic Computation in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, MAA Notes 24, (pp.43–55), Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, E. & Schwingendorf, K.: 1991, Calculus, Concepts and Computers, West: St. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T.: 1992, ‘On the development of a sense for functions’. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes 25, (pp. 153–174). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini-Mundi, J. & Graham, K.: 1994, ‘Research in calculus learning: understanding of limits, derivatives and integrals’. In J. J. Kaput & E. Dubinsky (eds.), Research Issues in Undergraduate Mathematics Learning, MAA Notes 33, (pp.31–45). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini-Mundi, J. & Gaudard, M.: 1992), ‘Preparation or Pitfall in the Study of College Calculus’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 23 (1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, J. T.: 1989, ‘Technology and mathematics education: a survey of recent developments and important problems’. Educational Studies in Mathematics 20, 237–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid, S.: 1992, ‘Calculus students use of symbols’, New Directions in Algebra Education, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frid, S.: 1994, ‘Three approaches to undergraduate calculus instruction: Their nature and potential impact on students’ language use and sources of conviction’. In E. Dubinsky, J. Kaput & A. Schoenfeld (eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education I, Providence, RI: AMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, A.M., Hughes Hallett, D., & Brettschneider C.: 1990, ‘Harvard Consortium’. In T.W. Tucker (ed.) Priming the Calculus Pump: Innovations and Resources, MAA Notes 17 (p.241). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, P., Lewis, P. & O’Keefe, J.: 1992, ‘Dynamic representation and the development of a process understanding of function’. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes 25, 235–260. Washington, DC 20036, MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E.M. & Tall, D.O.: 1994, ‘Duality, Ambiguity and Flexibility: A Proceptual View of Simple Arithmetic’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, D.H.: 1991, Building concept images — Supercalculators and students’ use of multiple representations in calculus, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heid, K.: 1988, ‘Resequencing skills and concepts in applied calculus using the computer as a tool’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, J.H. & West, B.: 1990, Ordinary Differential Equations (with software for the Macintosh computer). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes Hallett, D.: 1991, ‘Visualization and Calculus Reform’. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (eds.), Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics, MAA Notes No. 19, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M., Monaghan, J.D. & Roper, T.: 1993, ‘The effect of computer algebra use on students’ algebraic thinking’. In R. Sutherland (ed.), Working Papers for ESRC Algebra Seminar, London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J.J.,: 1992, ‘Technology and Mathematics Education’. In D. Grouws (ed.) Handbook on research in mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J.J.: 1993, ‘Fixing university calculus is not a viable strategy’. In M. Artigue & G. Ervynk, (eds.), Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V.A.: 1976, The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren (trans, J. Teller; ed., J. Kilpatrick & I. Wirzup). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, B.A. & Hirsch, C.R.: 1994, ‘Student preferences for representations of functions’. In L. Lum (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp. 178–190). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keisler, H. J.: 1976, Foundations of Infinitesimal Calculus, Boston: Prindle, Weber & Schmidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. & Tall, D.O.: 1993, ‘Constructing different concept images of sequences and limits by programming’. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tsukuba, Japan, 2, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamona-Downs, J.: 1990, ‘Pupils’ interpretation of the limit concept; a comparison study between Greeks and English’, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Mexico, 1, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovits, Z., Eylon B. & Bruckheimer M.: 1986, ‘Functions today and yesterday’, For the Learning of Mathematics 6, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovits, Z., Eylon B. & Bruckheimer M.: 1988, ‘Difficulties Students have with the Function Concept’, The Ideas of Algebra, K-12, NCTM 1988 Yearbook, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, J.D.: 1986, Adolescents’ Understanding of Limits and Infinity. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Warwick University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, J.D., Sun S. & Tall, D.O.: 1994, ‘Construction of the limit concept with a computer algebra system’, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lisbon, 3, 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller E.R.: 1991, MAPLE Laboratory in a Service Calculus Course. In L.C. Leinbach et al.(eds.) The Laboratory Approach to Teaching Calculus, MAA Notes. 20 (pp.111–117). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemirovsky, R.: 1993, ‘Calculus across all educational levels’, Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 56–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmiter, J.R.: 1991, ‘Effects of Computer Algebra Systems on Concept and Skill Acquisition in Calculus’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, I.: 1987, ‘Calculus Reform: Catching the Wave?’ Science News 132 (20), 317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology (W. May, trans.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.M.F. & Gray, E.M.: 1995, ‘Difficulties teaching mathematical analysis to non-specialists’. In L. Meira & D. Carraher, (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2, 18–25, Recife: Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada, A.R.: 1994, ‘What graphing calculators can do for college students: a recount of an experiment’. In L. Lum (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.683–688). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesada, A.R.: 1995, ‘On the effects of using graphics calculators in pre-calculus and calculus, part II’ In L. Lum (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.296–300). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A.: 1966, Non-Standard Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero i Chesa, C. & Azcárate Gimenez, C.: 1994, ‘An enquiry into the concept images of the continuum trying a research tool’, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Lisbon, 2, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberger, R.L.E. & Tall, D.O.: 1978, ‘Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits’, Mathematics Teaching 82, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M.: 1993, ‘A way to analyse several difficulties the pupils meet with in calculus’. In M. Artigue & G. Ervynck (eds.), Proceedings of Working Group 3 on Students’ Difficulties in Calculus, ICME-7, Québec, Canada, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, J., Mason, A., & Selden, A.: 1989, ‘Can average calculus students solve non routine problems?’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 8, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, J., Selden, A., & Mason, A.: 1994, ‘Even good calculus students can’t solve non routine problems’. In Kaput, J.J. & Dubinsky, E. (eds.) Research Issues in Undergraduate Mathematics Learning, MAA Notes 33 (pp. 19–26). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • School Mathematics Project,: 1991, Introductory Calculus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1991, ‘On the Dual Nature of Mathematical Conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A.: 1992, ‘Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandry of reification—the case of function’. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes 25, (pp.59–84). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A.: 1985, ‘Obstacles epistémologiques relatifs à la notion de limite’, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 6 (1), 5–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A.: 1987, ‘Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 18, 371–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A.: 1992, ‘Theoretical perspectives for development of the function concept’. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (eds.), The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, MAA Notes 25, (pp.23–58). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. & Confrey, J.: 1994, ‘Using a dynamic software tool to teach transformations of functions’. In L. Lum (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics, (pp.225–242). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.A. & Moore L.C.: 1991, ‘Project CALC: An Integrated Laboratory Course’. In C. Leinbach et al. (eds.), The Laboratory Approach to Teaching Calculus, MAA Notes 20 (pp.81–92, Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L.A., (ed.): 1988, Calculus for a New Century: a Pump, not a Filter, MAA Notes 8. Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutemeyer, D. et al.: 1985, MuMath, The Soft Warehouse, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoutemeyer, D. et al.: 1988, Derive, The Soft Warehouse, Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K.: 1976, ‘The teaching of elementary calculus: an approach using infinitesimals’, American Mathematical Monthly 83,370–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1985, ‘Understanding the calculus’, Mathematics Teaching 110,49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1986, ‘A graphical approach to integration and the fundamental theorem’, Mathematics Teaching 113,48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1987, ‘Whither Calculus?’, Mathematics Teaching, 117, 50–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O.: 1991, ‘Intuition and rigour: the role of visualization in the calculus’, Visualization in Teaching and Learning Mathematics (ed. S. Cunningham & W. S. Zimmermann, MAA Notes No. 19, (pp. 105–119). Washington DC: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O., & Sheath, G.: 1983, ‘Visualizing higher level mathematical concepts using computer graphics’, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Israel, 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D.O. & Vinner, S.: 1981, ‘Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 12, 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S.: 1983, ‘Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function’, The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 14, 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinner, S. & Hershkowitz, R.: 1980, ‘Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Berkeley, 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S.R.: 1991, ‘Models of Limit Held by College Calculus Students’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, N.G.: 1992, Mathematical Analysis: a comparison of student development and historical development. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Warwick, UK

    David Tall

Authors
  1. David Tall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia

    Alan J. Bishop

  2. Universiti Brunei, Darussalam, Brunei

    Ken Clements

  3. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

    Christine Keitel

  4. The University of Georgia, USA

    Jeremy Kilpatrick

  5. Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France

    Colette Laborde

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tall, D. (1996). Functions and Calculus. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Laborde, C. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Kluwer International Handbooks of Education, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7155-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1465-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation