Part of the Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy book series (SLAP, volume 35)
This volume consists of a collection of the papers presented at the interdisciplinary workshop ’Word-order and Parsing in Unification Grammars’ that took place in Friedenweiler (Schwarzwald) in April 1986. Two additional papers (Reyle, Wehrli) have been included that were not presented at the workshop. All the papers have been refereed and revised for publication. The workshop was organized by the members of the research project ’EUROTRA-D Begleitforschung (EUROTRA Germany accompanying research) which is sponsored by the BMFT (Secretary of Research and Technology). The aim of this research project is to investigate to what extent recent linguistic theories (especially Unification Grammars (UG) such as Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) and Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG)) can serve as a basis for machine translation. The results of this investigation, which is more oriented towards research than towards application, will be made available to EUROTRA, the Machine Translation Project of the EEC. At the workshop the problem was phrased in more general terms:
Shieber’s paper is an attempt to answer this question.
What can recent linguistic theories contribute to natural language processing?
KeywordsNoun Phrase Machine Translation Relative Clause Linguistic Theory Categorial Grammar
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abney, S./ Cole, J.(1985), A Government and Binding Parser, Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society XVIGoogle Scholar
- Dörre, J./ Eisele, A.(1986), A Lexical Functional Grammar System in Prolog, in: Proceedings of Coling 1986Google Scholar
- Engelberg et al.(1984), Con Tra: ein prozedurales Modell des Textverstehens für die Übersetzung. Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 99, KonstanzGoogle Scholar
- Frey, W./ Reyle, U.(1983), A Prolog Implementation of LFG as a Base for a Natural Language Processing System, in: Proceedings of the first Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pisa 1983Google Scholar
- Kamp, H.(1981), A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation, in: Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tract, Amsterdam, 1981Google Scholar
- Kaplan, R./ Bresnan, J.(1982), Lexical Functional Grammar: a Formal System for Grammatical Representation, in: Bresnan, J.(ed.) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
- Kay, M.(1979), Functional Grammar in: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society Google Scholar
- Kudo, I./ Nomura, H.(1986), Lexical Functional Transfer: A Transfer Framework in a Machine Translation System Based on LFG, in: Proceedings of Coling 1986Google Scholar
- Pereira, F.(1985), A new Characterization of Attachment Preferences, in: Dowty, D. et al. (eds.), Natural Language Parsing, Cambridge University Press, 1985Google Scholar
- Pereira, F.(1987), Grammars and Logics of Partial Information, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic Programming, Melbourne, 1987Google Scholar
- Shieber, S.(1983), Direct Parsing of ID/LP Grammars, Linguistics and Philosophy 7Google Scholar
- Shieber, S.(1984), Notes from the Unification Underground, Technical Note 327, SRI InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Uszkoreit, H. (1986), Constraints on Order. To appear in: Linguistics 24/5Google Scholar
- Tornita, M. (1986), Efficient Parsing for Natural Languages: A fast Algorithm for Practical Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1988