Skip to main content

Clinical Cost-Benefit of Screening Programmes

  • Chapter
Women at High Risk to Breast Cancer

Part of the book series: Developments in Oncology ((DION,volume 57))

  • 37 Accesses

Abstract

Breast cancer screening trials have provided the first clear evidence that early treatment can prolong life. The trials, in order to provide valid evidence on whether life is prolonged, have been based on comparisons of mortality from breast cancer in defined populations followed over several years. Results from two such populationbased trials of breast cancer screening (one in New York, the HIP study [1], the other in Sweden, the Two Counties study [2] have, so far, been published and both show a 30% reduction in breast cancer mortality attributable to screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shapiro, S. (1977). Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomised trial. Cancer, 39, 2772–2782.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, C.J.G., Gad, A. et al. (1985). Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet, i, 829–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Collette, HJ.A., Day, N.E., Rombach, JJ., de Waard, F. (1984). Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM Project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet, i, 1224–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verbeek, A.L.M., Hendricks, J.H.C.L. et al. (1984). Reduction in breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. (First results of the Nijmegan Project, 1975–81). Lancet, i, 1222–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palli, D., Roselli del Turco, M. et al. (1986). A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomised breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy). Int. J. Cancer, 38, 501–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Day, N.E., Chamberlain, J. (1988). Screening for breast cancer: Workshop Report. Eur. J. Cancer Oncol., 24, 55–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Working Group, Chariman• Forrest, P. (1987). Breast Cancer Screening. Report to the Health Ministers of England Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tabar, L., Fagerberg, G., Day, N.E., Holmberg, L. (1987). What is the optimum interval between mammographie screening examinations? Brit. J. Cancer, 55, 547–551.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailar, J. (1988). Mammography before 50 years? J. Amer. Med. Ass., 259, 1548–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. US Preventive Services Task Force (1987). Recommendations for breast cancer screening. J. Amer. Med. Ass., 257, 2196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, A.B., Howe, G.R., Wall, C. (1981). The national study of breast cancer screening: protocol for a Canadian randomized controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women. Clin. Invest. Med, 4, 227–258.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mant, D, Vessey, M.P., Neil, A., McPherson K., Jones, L. (1987). Breast self-examination and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Brit. J. Cancer. 55,207–211.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baines, C.J. (1983). Some thoughts on why women don’t do breast self-examination. Canad. Med. Ass. J., 128, 255–256.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sickles, E.A., Filly, F.A., Callen, P.W. (1983). Breast cancer detection with ultrasonography and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR, 140, 843–845.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gravelle, H.S.E., Simpson, P.R., Chamberlain, J. (1982). Breast cancer screening and health service costs. J. Hlth. Econ., 1, 185–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laara, E., Day, N.E., Hakama, M. (1987). Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet, 1, 1247–1249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander, F.E., Roberts, M.M., Huggins, A., Muir, B. (In press). The use of risk factors to allocate schedules for breast cancer screening. J. Epidem. Conunun. Hltl.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feig, S.A. (1984). Benefits and risks of mammography. Recent Results in Cancer Research, 90, 11–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moskowitz, M., Garside, P. (1982). Evidence of breast cancer mortality reduction: aggressive screening in women under age 50. AJR, 138, 911–916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen, M., Thomsen, J., Primdahl, S., Dyreborg, U., Andersen, J. (1987). Breast cancer and atypia among young and middle-aged women: a study of 100 medico-legal autopsies. Brit. J. Cancer, 56, 814–819.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Skrabanek, P. (1988). The physician’s responsibility to the patient. Lancet, i, 1155–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maclean, U., Sinfield, D., Klein, S., Harnden, B. (1984). Women who decline breast screening. J. Epidem. Commun. Hlth., 38, 278–283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall, F.M. (1986). Screening mammography–potential problems on the horizon. New Engl. J. Med., 314, 53–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellman, R. (1989). Clinical Cost-Benefit of Screening Programmes. In: Stoll, B.A. (eds) Women at High Risk to Breast Cancer. Developments in Oncology, vol 57. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1327-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1327-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7091-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1327-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics