The Concept of Probability pp 371-388 | Cite as

# QM Axiom Representations with Imaginary & Transfinite Numbers and Exponentials

## Abstract

A presentation is made showing how imaginary numbers, exponentials, and transfinite ordinals can be given logical meanings that are applicable to the definitions for the axioms of Quantum Mechanics (QM). This is based on a proposed logical definition for axioms which includes an axiom statement and its negation as parts of an undecidable statement which is forced to the tautological truth value: true. The logical algebraic expression for this is shown to be isomorphic to the algebraic expression defining the imaginary numbers ± i (V-l). This supports a progressive and Hegelian view of theory development. This means that thesis and antithesis axioms in the QM theory structure which should be carried along at present could later on be replaced by a synthesis to a deeper theory prompted by subsequently discovered new experimental facts and concepts. This process :ould repeat at a later time since the synthesis theory axioms would then be considered as a lew set of thesis statements from which their paired antithesis axiom statements would be derived. The present epistemological methods of QM, therefore, are considered to be a good way of temporarily leapfrogging defects in our conceptual and experimental knowledge until a deeper determinate theory is found. These considerations bring logical meaning to exponential forms like the Psi and wave functions. This is derives from the set theoretic meaning for simple forms like 2 which is blown to be the set of all subsets of the (discrete) set, A. The equal symbol in equations which are axioms, and all its other symbols, can be mapped to a transfinite ordinal, [maginary exponential forms (like e*″) can be shown to stand for the (continuous) set of all subsets or the set of all experimental situations (which thus includes arbitrary sets of experimental situations) which are based on the axiom, 0, a transfinite ordinal.

## Keywords

Quantum Mechanics Rest Frame Imaginary Number Null Element Logical Definition## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.Honig, W. M., ’Godel Axiom Mappings in Special Relativity and QM-Electromagnetic Theory’, Foundations of Physics, 6, 37–57 (1976).CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 2.Honig, W. M., The Quantum and Beyond. (1986) Chapters Seven and Six, Philosophical Library, 200 W.57 St., N.Y., N.Y.,10019.Google Scholar
- 3.Piron, C., Prosperi, G. M., & Jauch, J. M., Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Proceedings of the International School of Physics-Enrico Fermi, Academic Press, N.Y. (1971).Google Scholar
- 4.Kiss, S. A., Introduction to Algebraic Logic. Westport, Conn. USA (1961).Google Scholar
- 5.Sikorski. R., Boolean Algebras. Springer Verlag(1969).Google Scholar
- 6.Cohen, P. J., Set Theory & the Continuum Hypothesis, pp. 107–127, W. A. Benjamin (1966).Google Scholar
- 7.Honig, W.M., Logical Meanings in Quantum Mechanics for Axioms and for Imaginary and Transfinite Numbers and Exponentials’, Proceedings of 1986 NATO Conference: Quantum Violations, Recent & Future Experiments and Interpretations, to be published as Quantum Uncertainties by Plenum Press.New York (1987).Google Scholar
- 8.Varela, F. J., Principles of Biological Autonomy. Elsevier-North Holland, N.Y. (1979).Google Scholar
- 9.Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J., Autopoesis and Cognition. D. Reidel Publishing, Holland (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Honig, W. M., Transfinite Ordinals as Axiom Number Symbols for Unification of Quantum and Electromagnetic Wave Functions’, Int. Jour. Theor. Phvs.,
**15**, 87–90 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.Honig, W. M., ’On the Logical Status of Axioms - As Applied in QM and STR’, Bull. A.P.S.,
**31**, 844, Washington Meeting (1986).Google Scholar - 12.Fraenckel, A., Abstract Set Theory. Ch. II and III & pp.202–209, North-Holland (1961).Google Scholar
- 13.Fraenckel, A., Abstract Set Theory. Ch. II and III & pp. 158–159, North-Holland (1966).Google Scholar
- 14.Davis, J. & Hersh, A., The Mathematical Experience. 45–50, 237–250, Penguin, London (1983).Google Scholar
- 15.Robinson, A., Non-Standard Analysis. Ch. 1, 2, 3, North Holland (1966).Google Scholar
- 16.Frege, G., Foundations of Arithmetic, translation and original reprint pp.30–60, Oxford, Blackwell (1950).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sierpinski, W., Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers. Warsaw (1958).Google Scholar
- 18.Kamke, E., Theory of Sets Ch. III, IV, Dover (1950).Google Scholar
- 19.Gonshor, H., An Introduction to the Theory of Surreal Numbers, p. 3, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
- 20.Dauber, J. W., ’C. S. Pierce’s Philosophy of Infinite Sets’, 233–247 and its references, in Vol. II of Mathematics. People. Problems, Results, by D. Campbell & J. Higgins, Wadsworth, 1984.Google Scholar
- 21.Buchler. J., The Philosophical Writings of Pierce. Dover. 1955.Google Scholar
- 22.Kennard, E., Kinetic Theory of Gases, pp. 367–372, McGraw-Hill (1949).Google Scholar
- 23.Shannon, C., Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press (1949).Google Scholar
- 24.Boole, G., The Laws of Thought Dover, New York (Reprint, 1946).Google Scholar
- 25.Boole, G., The Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Philosophical Library, Inc., New York (Reprint, 1948).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 26.Honig, W. M., ’Physical Models for Hidden Variables, Non-Local Particles and All That’, in the Proceedings of the 1987 Gdansk Conference “Problems in Quantum Phvsics”. to issue in 1988.Google Scholar