Skip to main content

Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox

  • Conference paper
The Concept of Probability

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 24))

  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

Two types of inequalities have been proposed for the experimental study of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) paradox. Those of the first type (“ weak inequalities”), like the original one due to Bell, can be deduced from local realism alone. Those of the second type (“ strong inequalities”) can be deduced only thanks to the introduction of some assumption additional to local realism. All such “ additional assumptions” are reviewed and discussed. They are essentally arbitrary assumptions and no evidence exists supporting their validity. The performed experiments with atomic photon pairs violate only strong inequalities. Therefore local realism is still compatible with the existing empirical evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. S. J. Freedman and J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 938 (1972);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 1223 (1976);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nuovo Cimento 33B, 740 (1976);

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 465 (1976);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 460 (1981);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Aspect, P. Grangier G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 91 (1982);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804 (1982);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 1790 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. J. F. Clauser and M.A. Home Phys. Rev. D10, 526 (1974)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. W. Marshall, E. Santos and F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98 5 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. W. Marshall E. Santos F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98, 5 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. T.W. Marshall Phys. Lett. 99A, 163 (1983)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. 100A, 225 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.W. Marshall and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 107A 164 (1985)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Ferrero and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 116A 356 (1986)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. F. Selleri, ed., Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism: The Ein-stein,Podolsky , and Rosen Paradox (Plenum, London - New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Found. Phys. 10, 209 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Lepore, New Inequalities from Local Realism, Univ. of Bari, preprint, (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. See ref. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Garuccio and V. Rapisarda Nuovo Cimento A65, 269 (1981).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Aspect, These, Universite de Paris-Sud (1983), page 121.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Selleri, Is Bell’s Inequality Violated in Nature in Problems in Quantum Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Zeilinger and F. Selleri, A Deterministic Local Model for Einstein Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, Univ. of Bari preprint, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  26. E.P. Wigner >Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Selleri, F. (1989). Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox. In: Bitsakis, E.I., Nicolaides, C.A. (eds) The Concept of Probability. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7023-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1175-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics