Abstract
Two types of inequalities have been proposed for the experimental study of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) paradox. Those of the first type (“ weak inequalities”), like the original one due to Bell, can be deduced from local realism alone. Those of the second type (“ strong inequalities”) can be deduced only thanks to the introduction of some assumption additional to local realism. All such “ additional assumptions” are reviewed and discussed. They are essentally arbitrary assumptions and no evidence exists supporting their validity. The performed experiments with atomic photon pairs violate only strong inequalities. Therefore local realism is still compatible with the existing empirical evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
S. J. Freedman and J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 938 (1972);
R. A. Holt and F. M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);
J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 1223 (1976);
Nuovo Cimento 33B, 740 (1976);
E. S. Fry and R. C. Thompson Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 465 (1976);
A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 460 (1981);
A. Aspect, P. Grangier G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 91 (1982);
A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804 (1982);
A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 1790 (1985)
J. F. Clauser and M.A. Home Phys. Rev. D10, 526 (1974)
T. W. Marshall, E. Santos and F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98 5 (1983)
T. W. Marshall E. Santos F. Selleri Phys. Rev. A98, 5 (1983)
T.W. Marshall Phys. Lett. 99A, 163 (1983)
T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. 100A, 225 (1984).
T.W. Marshall and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 107A 164 (1985)
M. Ferrero and E. Santos Phys. Lett. 116A 356 (1986)
F. Selleri, ed., Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism: The Ein-stein,Podolsky , and Rosen Paradox (Plenum, London - New York, 1988).
A. Garuccio and F. Selleri, Found. Phys. 10, 209 (1980)
G. Lepore, New Inequalities from Local Realism, Univ. of Bari, preprint, (1987).
J. F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)
See ref. 2.
A. Garuccio and V. Rapisarda Nuovo Cimento A65, 269 (1981).
A. Aspect, These, Universite de Paris-Sud (1983), page 121.
F. Selleri, Is Bell’s Inequality Violated in Nature in Problems in Quantum Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988).
A. Zeilinger and F. Selleri, A Deterministic Local Model for Einstein Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, Univ. of Bari preprint, (1988).
E.P. Wigner >Am. J. Phys. 38, 1005 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Selleri, F. (1989). Physical Meaning of the Performed Experiments Concerning the EPR Paradox. In: Bitsakis, E.I., Nicolaides, C.A. (eds) The Concept of Probability. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7023-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1175-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive