Advertisement

Time and Enhancement: Two Possible Local Explanations for the EPR Puzzle

  • S. Pascazio
Conference paper
Part of the Fundamental Theories of Physics book series (FTPH, volume 24)

Abstract

The alleged generality of the experimental results against the so-called local realist theories is challenged on two major grounds : first, the “naturalness” of the notorious no-enhancement hypothesis is questioned ; second it is disclosed that the possibility of subluminal information exchanges cannot be ruled out in atomic cascade tests if the emission lifetimes of both photons are taken into account.

Keywords

Detection Probability Bell Inequality Emission Lifetime Local Explanation Count Probability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    C.S. Uu and I. Shaknov, Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 136;ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [1.A]
    L. R. Kasday, J.D. Ullman and C.S. Wu, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 15 (1970) 586;Google Scholar
  3. [1.B] Nuovo Cimento 25B (1975) 633;Google Scholar
  4. [1.C]
    M. Lamehi-Rachti and U. Mittig, Phys. Rev. 14 (1976) 2543ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [2]
    J.S. Bell, Physics 1 (1965) 195Google Scholar
  6. [3]
    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony and R. A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [4]
    J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home, Phys. Rev. 10D (1974) 526ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [5]
    T.U. Marshall, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  9. [6]
    S. Pascazio, in „Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism. The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox„ (Plenum Publ., 1988) F. Selleri ed.Google Scholar
  10. [7]
    E. Santos, in „Microphysical Reality and Quantum Formalism„ (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1988) G. Tarozzi A. van der Merwe eds.;Google Scholar
  11. [7.A]
    F. Selleri, in „Symposium on the Foundation of Modern Physics„ (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986) P. Lahti P. Mittelstaedt eds.Google Scholar
  12. [8]
    S.J. Freedman, J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 938;CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [8.A] R.A. Holt, P.M. Pipkin, Harvard University preprint (1974);Google Scholar
  14. [8.B]
    J.F. Clauser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36 (1976) 1223;CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [8.C]
    E.S. Fry, R.C. Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 465CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [8.D]
    A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Rogers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981) 460 ;CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [8.E] Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 91;Google Scholar
  18. [8.F]
    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1804;CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [8.G]
    U. Perrie, A.J. Duncan, H.J. Beyer, and H. Kleinpoppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1790ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [9]
    A. Garuccio, F. Selleri, Phys. Lett. 103A (1984) 99 and refs. therein;ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [9.A]
    M. Ferrero, T.U. Marshall and E. Santos, in „Quantum Mechanics versus Local Realism. The Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen paradox„. (Plenum Publ., 1988) F. Selleri ed. and refs. therein.Google Scholar
  22. [10]
    J.F. Clauser, A. Shimony, Rep. Progr. Phys. 41 (1978) 1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [11]
    A. Garuccio, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  24. [12]
    S. Pascazio, Phys. Lett. 111A (1985) 339; 118A (1986) 47ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [12.A]
    118A (1986) 47Google Scholar
  26. [13]
    S. Pascazio, J. Reignier, Phys. Lett. 126A (1987) 163ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Pascazio
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Département de MathématiqueUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Theoretische NatuurkundeVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations