Skip to main content

Judgement of Residual Stress Field Uniformity When Using the Hole-Drilling Method

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper examines the residual stress field depth uniformity test specified in the ASTM Standard E837-85 for measuring residual stresses using the hole-drilling method. It shows that the specified test does not give reliable results because the test does not properly account for the differences in the strain response caused by different types of residual stress fields, and also because the procedure uses a nonoptimal data normalization method. A modified procedure is described which overcomes these difficulties and gives consistent results. Because of the relative insensitivity of the hole drilling method to sub-surface stresses, the new procedure has only modest capabilities. The main use of the modified procedure is as an indicator of substantial stress field non-uniformity and of strain measurement error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Soete, W. and Vancrombrugge, R., An industrial method for the determination of residual stresses. Proceedings SESA, 1950, 8, (1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelsey, R.A., Measuring non-uniform residual stresses by the hole drilling method. Proceedings SESA, 1956, 14, (1), 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rendler, N.J. and Vigness, I., Hole-drilling strain-gage method of measuring residual stresses. Experimental Mechanics, 1966, 6, (12), 577–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaney, E.M., Accurate measurement of residual stress on any steel using the centre hole method. Strain, 1976, 12, (3), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schajer, G.S., Application of finite element calculations to residual stress measurements. J. Engineering Materials & Technology, 1981, 103, (2), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Measurement of Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage Method. Tech Note TN-503-2. Measurements Group, Inc., Raleigh, NC. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-drilling Strain-Gage Method. ASTM Standard E837-85. American Society for Testing and Materials. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schajer, G.S., Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the holedrilling method. I. Stress calculation procedures. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1988. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schajer, G.S., Measurement of non-uniform residual stresses using the holedrilling method. II. Practical application of the integral method. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1988. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flaman, M.T., Mills, B.E. and Boag, J.M., Analysis of stress-variation-with-depth measurement procedures for the center-hole method of residual stress measurement. Experimental Techniques, 1987, 11, (6), 35–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schajer, G.S. (1989). Judgement of Residual Stress Field Uniformity When Using the Hole-Drilling Method. In: Beck, G., Denis, S., Simon, A. (eds) International Conference on Residual Stresses. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1143-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1143-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7007-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1143-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics