Abstract
In the work of Anderson and Belnap on entailment logics relevance rather than modality emerged as the central concept (though modality is emphasized in one of Ackermann’s early papers). In the present paper I propose to investigate this concept through three closely connected analyses, one proof-theoretical, the other two semantical. On the strength of these analyses I defend a concept of relevant implication which is intuitionistic rather than classical (as in the work of Anderson, Belnap, Meyer, Dunn and others).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Urquhart, A. (1989). What is Relevant Implication?. In: Norman, J., Sylvan, R. (eds) Directions in Relevant Logic. Reason and Argument, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1005-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1005-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6942-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1005-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive