Abstract
Arthur W. Burks has argued with care and in detail for a theory of ampliative inference with a number of important and unique features. The outcome of his work in this area is contained in Chance, Cause, Reason (1977). Central to his system is his concept of inductive probability. His analysis of this concept has been strongly influenced by C. S. Peirce’s pragmatic theory of meaning. According to this theory we should equate the meaning of a statement with “the set of those practical conditionals that are logically implied by the statement” (p. 167). This can not be applied directly to probability statements; since the practical consequences of scientific statements must so often be expressed in terms of probability. So as to develop a satisfactory pragmatic theory of probability, Burks relates inductive probability on the one hand to a Calculus of Choice and on the other to empirical probability and causation.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Burks, Arthur W.: 1943, ‘Peirce’s conception of logic as a normative science’, Philosophical Review, LII, pp. 187–193.
Burks, Arthur W.: 1963, ‘On the significance of Carnap’s system of inductive logic for the philosophy of induction’, pp. 739–759 in Shillp (1963).
Burks, Arthur W.: 1977, Chance, Cause, Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1952, The Continuum of Inductive Methods, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Carnap, Rudolf: 1963, ‘Replies and systematic expositions’ pp. 859–1013 in Schlipp (1963).
Clendinnen, F. John: 1977, ‘Inference, practice and theory’ Synthese, 34, pp. 89–132.
Clendinnen, F. John: 1982, ‘Rational expectation and simplicity’ in McLaughlin (1982) pp. 1–25.
Colodny, Robert G.: 1966, Mind and Cosmos, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Goodman, Nelson: 1965, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, (Bobbs-Merril Co., Indianapolis(First edition 1955).
McLaughlin, R.(ed.): 1982, What? Where? When? Why?, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Reichenbach, H.: 1949, The Theory of Probability, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Salmon, Wesley, C: 1966, ‘The foundation of scientifc inference’, pp. 135–275 in Colodny (1966).
Schillp, P. A.: 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court, La Salle.
Searle, John R.: 1970, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Strawson, P. F.: 1952, Introduction to Logical Theory, Methuén, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clendinnen, F.J. (1990). Presuppositions and the Normative Content of Probability Statements. In: Salmon, M.H. (eds) The Philosophy of Logical Mechanism. Synthese Library, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0987-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0987-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6933-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0987-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive