Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 206))

Abstract

Arthur W. Burks has made major contributions to Peirce scholarship, computer science, automata theory, modal logic, and the philosophy of science; his contributions to any one of these areas would constitute a productive career most academics would envy. Disparate as these fields are, in Burks’ approach to them there are deep interconnections. And in his monumental work Chance, Cause, Reason 1 Burks manages to exploit these interconnections to provide a richly detailed account of “the ultimate nature of the knowledge acquired by the empirical sciences.” (p. 651) It does so by presenting his Presupposition Theory of Induction, a theory that provides a rich foundational analysis of “standard inductive logic” — which, according to Burks, “is the system of rules of inductive inference actually used and aspired to by the practicing scientist.” (p. 654)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burks, A. W.: 1977, Chance, Cause, Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LB.,1977‘History and the philosopher of science’, in Suppe (1977) pp. 308–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1969, Seeing and Knowing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo Galilei: 1953, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, trans, Stillman Drake, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.: 1967‘,A causal theory of knowledge, Journal of Philosophy 64, pp. 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1970‘,Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programme’, in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 91–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave (eds.): 1970, Criticism and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, V. and E. Kohler (eds.): 1974, Developments in the Methodology of Social Science, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: 1952, Optics, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1954‘Theories and phenomena’ in Leinfellner and Kohier (1974), pp. 45–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1977,Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed., University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F.: 1989,The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suppe, F. (1990). Is Science Really Inductive?. In: Salmon, M.H. (eds) The Philosophy of Logical Mechanism. Synthese Library, vol 206. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0987-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0987-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6933-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0987-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics