Skip to main content

Relevant Predication 3: Essential Properties

  • Chapter
Book cover Truth or Consequences

Abstract

I owe much to my thesis director Nuel Belnap, but I wonder if I can blame him for my recent idealist tendencies. The novelist Colin Wilson (1967) has a theory of ideas as infectious agents, much like viruses and needing hosts. It is interesting to speculate how the idealist infection was transmitted from Blanshard to Anderson and Belnap at Yale, and from them to me as their graduate student at Pittsburgh. Perhaps rather than being an infectious disease it is a hereditary one, linked in some complicated way with the intellectual genes for relevance logic, Platonism, and logical humor.

I will not repeat here all of the acknowledgements made in Dunn (1987, 1990), but many of those same people continue to have an effect on the present paper. Also I want to thank my new colleague Anil Gupta for some very helpful conversations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. et al. (1975): Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1, Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. D. (1967): “Intensional Models for First Degree Formulas,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 32, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanshard, B. (1962): Reason and Analysis, La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosanquet, B. (1888): Logic, or the Morphology of Knowledge, 3 vols., Oxford Univ. Press, 2nd edition, 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. (1987): “Relevant Predication 1: The Formal Theory,” Journal of Philosophical Logic, 16, pp. 347–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. M. (1990): “Relevant Predication 2: Intrinsic Properties and Internal Relations,” forthcoming in Philosophical Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, A. C. (1934): Idealism, A Critical Survey, London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. (1985): The Metaphysics of Modality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1962): Knowledge and Belief, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1967): “Individuals, Possible Worlds, and Epistemic Logic,” Noûs, 1, pp. 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1963): “Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic,” Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16, pp. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S. A. (1972): Naming and Necessity, republished 1980 by Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. K. (1968): “Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic,” The Journal of Philosophy, 65, pp. 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maksimova, L. (1973): “A Semantics for the Calculus E of Entailment,” Bulletin of the Section of Logic, Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, 2, pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcan Marcus, R. (1967): “Essentialism in Modal Logic,” Noûs, 1, pp. 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R. K., Dunn, J. M. and Leblanc, H. (1974): “Completeness of Relevant Quantification Theories,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15, pp. 97–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1922): “External and Internal Relations,” in Philosophical Studies, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Inc., pp. 253–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. (1962): Common-place Book 1919-1953, ed. C. Lewy, London: George Allen & Unw in Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1967): “Grades of Essentialism in Modal Logic,” Noûs, 1, pp. 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1956): “Three Grades of Modal Involvement,” in The Ways of Paradox, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. and Stalnaker, R. C. (1968): “Modality and Reference,” 2, pp. 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. and Stalnaker, R. C. (1968a): “Abstraction in First-Order Modal Logic,” Theoria, 34, pp. 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. (1967): The Mind Parasites, Oakland, California: Oneiric Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dunn, J.M. (1990). Relevant Predication 3: Essential Properties. In: Dunn, J.M., Gupta, A. (eds) Truth or Consequences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0681-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0681-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6791-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0681-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics