Skip to main content

The organization of competition in congressional and parliamentary governments

  • Chapter
The Competitive State

Part of the book series: International Studies in Economics and Econometrics ((ISEE,volume 21))

Abstract

It is not a caricature of the conventional wisdom to say that it holds to the view that congressional governments are invested with numerous checks and balances and are, as a consequence, internally competitive bodies, while parliamentary governments are all but devoid of such checks and balances and are internally non-competitive. The purpose of this paper is to argue that the conventional wisdom is mistaken, that on an a priori basis both forms of government are competitive, though competition is organized very differently in the two structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Auerback, A.J. and L.J. Kotlikoff: 1987, Dynamic Fiscal Policy, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagehot, W.: 1867/1983, The English Constitution, Fontana/Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothwell, R., I. Drummond and J. English: 1981, Canada Since 1945: Power, Politics, and Provincialism, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A.: 1988, “Intragovernmental Competition”, Typescript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and R. Wintrobe: 1982, The Logic of Bureaucratic Conduct, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M.: 1963, “The Economics of Earmarked Taxes”,Journal of Political Economy 71,5, October, 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M.: 1967, Public Finance in Democratic Process, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and M.R. Flowers: 1987, The Public Finances, Irwin, Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock: 1962, The Calculus of Consent, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. and G. Szablowski: 1979, The Super-Bureaucrats: Structure and Behavior in Central Agencies, Macmillan, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.: 1966, “The Possibility of a Social Welfare Function”, American Economic Review 61 (5), 1105–1122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. and S. Marks with R. Mnookin: 1982, “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior”, Journal of Legal Studies XI (2), 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman, R.: 1975, The Diaries of a Cabinet Minister, I, Hamish Hamilton and Jonathon Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti G. and A. Breton: 1986, “An Economic Theory of Political Parties”, Kyklos 39, (Fasc 1) 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, D.G.: 1982, The Revenue Budget Process of the Government of Canada: Description, Appraisal and Proposals, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartle, D.G.: 1988, The Expenditure Budget Process of the Government of Canada: A Public Choice - Rent Seeking Perspective, Canadian Tax Foundation, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H.: 1977, A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington, Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L.: 1965, Public Economics, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, N. ed.: 1982, Powers of Congress, Second Edition, Congressional Quarterly, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, K.L.: 1966, “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”, Journal of Political Economy 74 (2), 132–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, A. and R. Tollison: 1980, “A Theory of Legislative Organization: Making the Most of Your Majority”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 94 (2), 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, E.: 1919/1964, “Just Taxation - A Positive Solution” in R.A. Musgrave and A.T. Peacock, eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslove, A.M., M.J. Prince and G.B. Doern: 1986, Federal and Provincial Budgeting, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, R.H. and L. Kornhauser: 1979, “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce”, Yale Law Journal 88 (5), 950–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A.: 1959, The Theory of Public Finance, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. and P.B. Musgrave: 1984, Public Finance in Theory and Practice, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A., P.B. Musgrave and R.M. Bird: 1987, Public Finance in Theory and. Practice, First Canadian Edition, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P.C.: 1973, Renegade in Power, McClelland and Stewart, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polsby, N.W.: 1984, Congress and the Presidency, Fourth Edition Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, I. and A. Peacock: 1987, “Government Debt and Growth in Public Spending”, Public Finance 42 (2), 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A.: 1969, “Pure Theory of Public Expenditure and Taxation”, in J. Margolis and H. Guitton, eds.: 1969, Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and Their Relations to the Private Sectors, Macmillan, London. Reprinted in R.C. Merton, ed., The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume 3 (Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1972) 492–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A.: 1975, “Congressional Committee Assignments: An Optimization Model with Institutional Constraints”, Public Choice 22,55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, K.A. and B.R. Weingast: 1981, “Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice” Public Choice 37 (3), 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J.: 1987, The Theory of Price, Fourth Edition, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, R.: 1983, “Ottawa’s Expenditure Process: Four Systems in Search of Coordination” in G.B.Doern, ed., How Ottawa Spends: The Liberals, the Opposition, and Federal Priorities, Lorimer, Toronto, 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B.R. and W.J. Marshall: 1988, “The Industrial Organization of Congress: or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets”, Journal of Political Economy 96(1), 132–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (ed.): 1987, Power in Congress, Congressional Quarterly, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K.: 1896/1964, “A New Principle of Just Taxation” in R.A. Musgrave and A.T. Peacock, eds., Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breton, A. (1991). The organization of competition in congressional and parliamentary governments. In: Breton, A., Galeotti, G., Salmon, P., Wintrobe, R. (eds) The Competitive State. International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0645-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0645-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6775-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0645-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics