Abstract
The frame problem originally surfaced within McCarthy’s Situation Calculus [McCarthy68], when [McCarthy&Hayes69] applied it to reasoning about goal achievement. To illustrate their approach, they considered the problem of initiating a telephone conversation. They began by writing down plausible axioms which seemed to characterize the preconditions and effects of looking up a person’s telephone number and dialling that number. However, they found that they were still unable to prove that the plan “look up the number and dial it” would work, even if all the initial conditions were right (i.e., that the caller had a telephone and a telephone book, that the intended party was home, etc.). For example, the axioms provided no assurance that looking up the number would not make the caller’s telephone disappear, thus voiding a precondition for dialling.
“One feels that there should be some economical and principled way of succinctly saying what changes an action makes, without having to explicitly list all the things it doesn’t change as well; yet there doesn’t seem to be any other way to do it. That is the frame problem.”
Pat Hayes [Hayes87; p. 125]
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Allen, J. F. “Towards a general theory of action and time,” Artificial Intelligence 23, 1984.
Bacchus, F. “Statistically founded degrees of belief,” Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence (CSCSI ‘88), June 6–10, Edmonton, Alberta 1988.
Brown, F. M., ed. The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Dean, J. and K. Kanazawa. “Probabilistic Causal Reasoning,” Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence (CSCSI ‘88), June 610, Edmonton, Alberta 1988.
Fikes, R. E. and N. J. Nilsson. “STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem-proving to problem-solving,” Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI ‘71), Morgan Kaufmann, 1971.
Fodor, J. A. “Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs, and the music of the spheres,” The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Pylyshyn, Z. W., ed., Ablex, 1987.
Georgeff, M. P. and A. M. Lansky. Reasoning about Actions and Plans, Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Georgeff, M. P. “Actions, processes, causality,” Reasoning about Actions and Plans, Georgeff, M. P. and A. M. Lansky, eds., Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Green, C. “Application of theorem proving to problem solving,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI ‘69), Morgan Kaufmann, 1969.
Haas, A. R. “The case for domain-specific frame axioms,” The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Brown, F. M., ed., Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Hanks, S. and D. McDermott. “Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection,” Artificial Intelligence 33, 1987.
Hayes, P. J., “What the frame problem is and isn’t,” The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Pylyshyn, Z. W., ed., Ablex Publishing Corp., 1987.
Kowalski, R. A. “Logic for Problem Solving,” Artificial Intelligence Series 7, Elsevier, 1979.
Kowalski, R. A. “Database updates in the event calculus,” Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, July, DOC 86/12, London, England, 1986.
Kowalski, R. A. and M. J. Sergot. “A logic-based calculus of events,” New Generation Computing 4, 1986.
Kyburg, H. “Probabilistic inference and probabilistic reasoning,” Proceedings of The Fourth Workshop on Uncertainty in AI, Philadelphia, PA, 1988.
Lansky, A. L. “A representation of parallel activity based on events, structure, and causality,” Reasoning about Actions and Plans, Georgeff, M. P. and A. M. Lansky, eds., Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Lifschitz, V. “Formal theories of action,” The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Brown, F. M., ed., Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
Manna, Z. and R. Waldinger. “A theory of plans,” Reasoning about Actions and Plans, Georgeff, M. P. and A. M. Lansky, eds., Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
McCarthy, J. “Programs with common sense,” Semantic Information Processing, M. Minsky, MIT Press, 1968.
McCarthy, J. “First-order theories of individual concepts and propositions,” Machine Intelligence 9, D. Michie, ed., Edinburgh University Press, 1979.
McCarthy, J. “Circumscription— a form of non-monotonic reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980.
McCarthy, J. “Applications of circumscription to formalizing commonsense knowledge,” Proceedings of the Nonmonotonic Reasoning Workshop, New Paltz, NY Oct. 17–19, 1986.
McCarthy, J. and P. J. Hayes. “Some philiosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence, ” Machine Intelligence 4, B. Meltzer and D. Michie, eds., Edinburgh University Press, 1969.
McDermott, D., “A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plans,” Cognitive Science 6, 1982.
Pearl, J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. The Robot’s Dilemma: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence, Ablex, 1987.
Raphael, B. “The frame problem in problem solving systems,” Artificial Intelligence and Heuristic Programming, N. V. Findler and B. Meltzer, eds., Edinburgh, 1971.
Reiter, R. “A logic for default reasoning,” Artificial Intelligence 13, 1980.
Schank, R. C. and R. P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Erlbaum, 1977.
Weber, J. “Statistical inference and causal reasoning,” Proceedings Eleventh International Joint Conference on AI (IJCAI ‘89), Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schubert, L. (1990). Monotonic Solution of The Frame Problem in The Situation Calculus. In: Kyburg, H.E., Loui, R.P., Carlson, G.N. (eds) Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0553-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0553-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6736-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0553-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive