Abstract
If philosophy is the devil’s whore, as Martin Luther once quipped, then biogeography and biological systematics are fast becoming Old Nick’s bordello. Advocates of the new biogeography, ecology and geography (Haines-Young and Petch, 1980; Nelson and Platnick, 1981; Simberloff, 1983) attempt to lay the foundations for these disciplines within the twin philosophical strictures of Popper’s (1959, 1972) epistemological prescription for critical rationalism and falsification. This attempt to enlist philosophy as the paid companion of these sciences traps them within traditional binary oppositions; e.g. science versus non-science; falsifiable and testable hypotheses versus narrative, ‘Just so’ scenarios; ecological versus historical biogeography; pattern versus process; and vicariance versus dispersal, which serve to polarize debate (Chapter 2).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Craw, R. (1990). Panbiogeography: method and synthesis in biogeography. In: Myers, A.A., Giller, P.S. (eds) Analytical Biogeography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0435-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0435-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-40050-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0435-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive