Skip to main content

Studying Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes: The Approach of the FIFB

  • Chapter
Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes

Part of the book series: The GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 35))

Abstract

The landscapes and ecosystems of Central and Western Europe are of recent origin. They developed after the end of the last ice age. The retreat of the ice was followed by a continuous immigration of species and changes to the developing ecosystems (Erz 1983). Humans played a role in these changes early on by exploiting and cultivating land resources (Ellenberg 1986, Küster 1992). Natural ecosystems - ecosystems with a minimum of human interference - barely had the chance to evolve or soon disappeared (De Vries 1995).For a considerable time, human land use contributed to a diversification of the developing cultural landscape, made habitats available for many species, and created new ecosystems with a wide range of extensively used habitats. These biotopes, e.g. species rich grasslands, are now considered very valuable for nature conservation because they shrank from about 30% of the cultivated land to less than 1% due to intensification of agriculture and forestry. Even the fauna of our nature reserves principally is now a product of the developing cultural landscape. Within the last century, the cultural landscape rapidly changed again and the diversification process was reversed (Erz 1983). In spite of numerous activities, the on-going decline and finally demise of species could not be stopped. This led to doubts about the efficiency of conservation measures and strategies practiced so far. In Germany, these strategies consisted mainly of the formal protection of numerous small reserves without any consideration of the area required for viable populations and in the implementation of systems of habitats connected by corridors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andren, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. OIKOS 71, 355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (1996). Forschungför die Natur. Berichte aus der ökologischen Forschung. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, M.S. (1992). Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 481–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, G. (1980). Analysis of Vertebrate Populations. John Wiley, Chichester, New York & Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, G. (1994). Directions in conservation biology. Journal Animal Ecology 63, 215–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, A.Y. (1986). Habitat evaluation systems. - In: A.Y. Cooperrider, R.J. Boyd & H.R. Stuart (eds.). Inventory and Monitoring of Wildlife Habitat. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, pp. 757–776

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, M.F.W. (1995). Large herbivores and the design of large-scale nature reserves in Western Europe. Conservation Biology 9, 25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. & T.J. Case (1986). Community Ecology, Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H. (1986). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Erz, W. (1983). Artenschutz im Wandel, konkrete und quantifizierte Vorstellungen für veränderte Strategien. Umschau 83/11, 695–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, K., M. Drechsler & K. Henle (1996). Biotopverbundsysteme als Naturschutzstrategie - Bewertung aus theoretischer Sicht. Jahresbericht, UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrums Leipzig-Halle ‘92–‘95, 52–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, K. & G. Kaule (1991). Arten- und Biotopschutzforschung für Deutschland. Forschungszentrum, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, K. & K. Rimpp (1993). Überleben von Amphibien und Reptilien in Metapopulationen - Ergebnisse einer 26-jährigen Erfassung. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft für Ökologie 22, 215–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, K., J. Settele & S. Hufe (1995). Forschungsverbund Isolation Flächengröße Biotopqualität. UFZ- Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovestadt, T., J. Roeser & M. Mühlenberg (1991). Flächenbedarf von Tierpopulationen. Forschungszentrum, Jülich

    Google Scholar 

  • Küster, H. (1992). Die Geschichte des Grünlandes aus pollenanalytischer und archäobotanischer Sicht. Laufener Seminarbeiträge 2/92, 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science 241, 1441–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenberg, M. (1993). Freilandökologie (3. Aufl.). Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlenberg, M., T. Hovestadt & J. Röser (1991). Are there minimal areas for animal populations? - In: A. Seitz & V. Loeschcke (eds.). Species Conservation: A Population-Biological Approach. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 227–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A.O. & C.R. Margules (1991). The design of studies to demonstrate the biological importance of corridors. - In: D.A. Saunders & R.J. Hobbs (eds.). Nature Conservation 2. The Role of Corridors. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, pp. 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E.R. (1988). Evolutionary Ecology (4thedition). Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., J.D. Nichols, C. Brownie, & J.E. Hines (1990). Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107, 1–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Reck, H.R. & G. Kaule (1993). Straßen und Lebensräume. Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik 654, 1–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Reck, H.R., E. Walter, E. Osinski, G. Kaule, T. Heini, U. Kick & M. Weiss (1994). Ziele und Standards für die Belange des Arten- und Biotopschutzes: Das “Zielartenkonzept” als Beitrag zur Fortschreibung des Landschaftsrahmenprogrammes in Baden-Württemberg. Laufener Seminarbeiträge 4/94, 65–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Roweck, H. (1993). Zur Naturverträglichkeit von Naturschutz-Maßnahmen. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fir Ökologie 22, 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, A. (1995). Gene flow and the genetic structure of populations of Central European animal species, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Zoologie 88.2, 61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, A., W. Reh, M. Veith & Wolfes R. (1994). Gene flow between and within natural vertebrate populations, Animal Biotechnology 5, 155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settele, J., K. Henle & C. Bender (in press). Metapopulationen und Biotop verbünd: Theorie und Praxis am Beispiel von Schmetterlingen und Reptilien. Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M.L. (1990). Population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 4, 39–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. (1987). Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1986). Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. - In M.E. Soulé (ed). Conservation Biology. The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 330–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B.A. (1984). In situ conservation of genetic resources: Determinants of minimum area require¬ments. - In: J.A. McNeely & K.R. Miller (eds.). National Parks, Conservation, and Development. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp. 639–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D.S. (1994). Turning conservation goals into tangible results: The case of the spotted owl and old- growth forests. - In: P.J. Edwards, R.M. May & N.R. Webb (eds). Large-scale Ecology and Conser¬vation Biology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 313–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, B.A. (1988). Tropical deforestation and extinction. - In: IUCN (eds.). Red List of Threatened Ani¬mals. IUCN, Gland, pp. V-IX

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1992). The Diversity of Life. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muhlenberg, M., Henle, K., Settele, J., Poschlod, P., Seitz, A., Kaule, G. (1996). Studying Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes: The Approach of the FIFB. In: Settele, J., Margules, C., Poschlod, P., Henle, K. (eds) Species Survival in Fragmented Landscapes. The GeoJournal Library, vol 35. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0343-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0343-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6640-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0343-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics