Skip to main content

The Story of a Non-Discovery: Helmholtz And The Conservation Of Energy

  • Chapter
Spanish Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 186))

Abstract

Apparently, there are at least two significant historiographic problems to be examined if we are to understand the history of physics during the 19th century. The first is how physics became a hegemonic science during the previous century. The second concerns its intellectual organization. The first problem can be approached in many ways but the general temptation is to treat it as a question closely related to the social projection of physics, its institutional acceptance and the transformation of society during the previous century. The studies of C. Jungnickel, R. MacCormach and D. Cahan are just three examples of the many which approach the problem from this standpoint.1 With regard to how the second problem should be examined, it is possible to refer to a great number of works which offer an equally great number of different approaches. This is due to the fact that an explanation of the evolution of scientific concepts, let alone that of theories in physics, requires a characterization of those problems which have motivated scientific activity and of the options which have guided the human imagination in creating images to represent Nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Poncelet, Introduction a la mécanique industrielle physique ou experimentale, Metz: 1841; § 138. Quoted by E. Meyerson, op. cit., p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Meyer, Bemerkungen über die Kräfte de unbelteb Natur, Heilbronn, verlag der C. Drechslerschen Buchhandlung: 1845.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cantor, Michael Faraday: Sandemanian and Scientist. London: 1991. Macmillan Press, pp. 185 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Cardwell, James Joule: A Biography. Manchester: 1989, Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Steffens, James Prescott Joule and the Concept of Energy. New York, 1979, Neale Watson Academic Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Helm “Zur Energetik” _Annalen der Physik, 57, (1896), 650, 652.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Paul “German academic science and the mandarin ethos 1850–1880”, British Journal for the History of Science 1984, 17 pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ordóñez, J. (1996). The Story of a Non-Discovery: Helmholtz And The Conservation Of Energy. In: Munévar, G. (eds) Spanish Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 186. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0305-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0305-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6622-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0305-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics