Skip to main content

Decision Theory, Individualistic Explanations and Social Darwinism

  • Chapter
Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 178))

Abstract

There is an important sense in which decision theory1 is not individualistic. A rational agent will choose the option whose utility, relatively to his own preferences, is the greatest. But the options over which he has to choose and the particular way their utility for him relates to other actor’s choices are both part of the context of choice. The rationality of choices, that is, their maximizing character, is then assessed for choices made in a given environment. In interpreting theories framed in a rational choice set up, such an environment will pattern a certain state of the world, a certain social environment, including economic and political contexts shaping, together with individual rationality and preferences, the very outcome of interactive choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., 1978, ‘Values and Collective Decision-Making’, in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 3e series, B. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. H. and Muller, F., 1983, ‘Essential Aggregation Procedures on Restricted Domains of Preferences’, Journal of Economic Theory 21, 186–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, G., 1976, ‘Consistency, Rationality and Collective Choice’, Review of Economic Studies 43, 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbeck, M., 1968, Readings in the Philosophy of Social Sciences, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couture, J., 1993, ‘Sélection rationnelle’, to appear in: Les Cahiers scientifiques de I’ACFAS, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and Roemer, J. (eds.), 1991, Interpersonal Comparison of Well-Being, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and Hylland, A., 1986, Foundations of Social Choice Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, 1892, Mathematical Investigation in the Theory of Value and Prices, in: Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Sciences. Re-publication: Yale University Press, New Haven, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A., 1973, ‘Manipulation on Voting Schemes: A General Result’, Econometrica 41, 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P., 1976, ‘Equity, Arrow’s Conditions, and Rawls’s Difference Principle’, Econometrica 44, 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C., 1955, ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparison of Utilities’, Journal of Political Economy 63, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E., 1985, ‘Solutions in the Bargaining Problem’, in L. Horwitz, D. Schmeider and H. Sonnenschein (eds.), Social Goals and Social Organisation, Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I. M. D., 1949, ‘A Reformulation of the Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour’, Oxford Economic Papers 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R, 1977, ‘On Austrian Methodology’, Synthese 36, 353–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. (ed.), 1973, Modes of Individualism and Collectivism, Heineman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V., 1906, Manuel d’Economie Politique, trad. 1927 (2e ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. W. S., 1980, ‘Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels’, Review of Economic Studies XLVII, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A., 1938, ‘A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumers Behaviour’, Economica 5, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1976, ‘Welfare Inequalities and Rawlsian Axiomatics’, Theory and Decision 7, 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1979, Collective Choice and Social Welfare, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1973, ‘Behaviour and the Concept of Preference’, in J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice, New York University Press, New York, 1986, 60–81. Reprinted from Economica 40, 1973, 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1977, ‘Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination’, Econometrica 45, 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1982, Choice, Welfare and Measurements, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K., 1983, Rational Choice, Collective Decision and Social Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J., 1985, in R. Campbell and Lanning, Sowden (eds.), Paradoxes of Rationality and Co-operation: Prisoner’s Dilemma and Newcomb’s Problem. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Couture, J. (1996). Decision Theory, Individualistic Explanations and Social Darwinism. In: Marion, M., Cohen, R.S. (eds) Québec Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 178. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0113-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0113-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6537-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0113-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics