Skip to main content

Are the Samples Doped — If so, How Much?

  • Conference paper
Book cover Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods

Part of the book series: Fundamental Theories of Physics ((FTPH,volume 70))

  • 387 Accesses

Abstract

The concentration of a chemical in a compound varies across samples, due to uncontrolled factors. A substitute for the compound likewise contains a variable concentration of this chemical. The concentration is measured in samples of the compound and the substitute, and in a manufactured version of the compound. Probability theory is applied to investigate whether the manufacturer is doping the compound with its substitute, and if so by how much.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Referencess

  1. Coomans, D. & Massart, D.L. 1992. Hard Modelling in Supervised Pattern Recognition.In: R.G. Brereton (ed), Multivariate Pattern Recognition in Chemometrics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp249–287. This work gives further references on milk classification.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cox, R.T. 1946. Probability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation. American Journal of Physics 14, 1–13.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Jaynes, E.T. 1983. E.T. Jaynes: Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics.R.D. Rosenkrantz (ed). Synthese Library 158. Reidel, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaynes, E.T. Probability Theory: the Logic of Science. Book, in preparation; interim versions available at http: //omega. albany. edu: 8008/JaynesBook. html.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tribus, M. 1969. Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs. Pergamon, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffreys, H. 1939. Theory of Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garrett, A.J.M. 1991. Ockham’s Razor. In: W.T. Grandy & L.H. Schick (eds ), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, Laramie, Wyoming, USA, 1990. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp 357–364

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garrett, A.J.M. (1996). Are the Samples Doped — If so, How Much?. In: Skilling, J., Sibisi, S. (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 70. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0107-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0107-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6534-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0107-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics