Skip to main content
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Proposed solutions to sustainability often bring different economic sectors into conflict; when a sustainable solution for one sector is non-sustainable for another it creates what we call the dilemma of sustainability. A recent example took place in the Columbia Basin of the Pacific Northwest, involving competing notions of sustainability by fisheries and the energy industry. Taking up some ideas of Eger and Lyotard, we criticize the constructivist approach which treats large ecosystems as constructions and the process of resolving conflicts of sustainability as one solely consisting of negotiations involving the trading off of interests. We propose instead to treat such conflict resolution via a Gadamerian-inspired hermeneutics that sees different economic sectors as having different interpretations of sustainability and that aims at common understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bernasconi, R., 1995, “You Don’t Know What I’m Talking About”: Alterity and the Hermeneutical Ideal’, in: The Specter of Relativism, Truth, Dialogue and Phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics, Schmidt, L.K. (ed.), Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J., 1985, ‘From Hermeneutics to Praxis’, in: Hermeneutics and Praxis, Hollinger, R. (ed.), Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 272–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eger, M., 1997, Achievements of the Hermeneutic-Phenomenological Approach to Natural Science: A Comparison with Constructivist Sociology Man and World, 30: 343–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G., 1989, Truth and Method, 2nd revised edition, trans. J. Winsheimer and D.G. Marshall, New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gremmen, B., 1993, The Mystery of the Practical Use of Scientific Knowledge, Elst: Betuwe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.N., 1993, Compass and Gyroscope, Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.F., 1988, The Differend, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, T., 1995, ‘Historicism, Social Practice, and Sustainability: Some Themes in Hegelian Ethical Theory.’ Neue Hefte für Philosophie, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987 Our Common Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gremmen, B., Jacobs, J. (1997). Understanding sustainability. In: Crease, R.P. (eds) Hermeneutics and the Natural Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0049-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0049-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6511-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0049-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics