Is the “Livestock Revolution” Achievable in Water Deprived Areas? A Reflection from Experiments with Irrigated Smallholder Farms in Morocco

  • Mohamed Taher SraïriEmail author


A significant increase in the global demand of animal products is expected in the near future, because of changes in food consumption patterns in emerging countries. To fulfil the needs, a “Livestock Revolution” should occur and it will have to target in priority smallholder farms in developing countries, as they are the main actors in supply chains of milk and meat. To achieve an increase in milk yield and live weight gain at farm level, new tools of intervention have to be tested. In fact, in many developing countries, State services are currently withdrawing from their traditional support to farmers, and therefore innovative methods should be set-up. They will also require a more responsible implication of the stakeholders in supply chains, particularly with well-organized farmers’ associations. In areas characterized by water stress and climate change, this should be a top priority issue in the agenda of agricultural development institutions. It is generally acknowledged that livestock production necessitates important volumes of water for forage production and rations conceptions. In this chapter, an example of an intervention research is presented from the Tadla large-scale irrigation scheme (centre of Morocco) as an illustration of intensive cattle dairy production in a semi arid region (less than 300 mm of annual rainfall). Results related to the evaluation of water productivity through cattle farming and trials to increase the average milk yield per cow are presented. A reflection on the possibilities to use “virtual water” and on the generalisation of such methods to whole dairy farmers in a supply basin (i.e. an irrigation scheme) is finally developed with its consequences on the resilience of smallholder units. Thus, a capacity building process is urgently required to upgrade farmers’ performances. This will induce the adoption of on-farm practices, from irrigation systems to soil fertility management and forage biomass production. It will also rely on the continuous design of balanced dietary rations for lactating cows and their impacts on cattle load (number of cattle per ha of forage). Finally, more attention should be paid to the existing farmers’ co-operatives, which would constitute crucial operators in disseminating innovation processes to face the challenges of water shortage in cattle production systems.


Animal production Morocco Smallholder farms Farmers support Water productivity 


  1. Agency of Agricultural Development (Morocco) (2011) The Green Morocco Plan.
  2. Alary V, Faye B (2001) Stakes of animal production in Southern countries. INRA Productions Animales 14:3–13Google Scholar
  3. Allan JA (1998) Virtual water: a strategic resource—global solutions to regional deficits Groundwater 36:545–546Google Scholar
  4. Arriaga-Jordan M, Albarran-Portillo B, Espinoza-Ortega A, Garcia-Martinez A, Castelan-Ortega OA (2002) On-farm comparison of feeding strategies based on forages for small-scale dairy production systems in the highlands of central Mexico. Exp Agric 38:375–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baya B (1997) Maïs fourrager (Zea mays). In: G. Jaritz, M. Bounejmate (eds.) Production et utilisation des cultures fourragères au Maroc, (INRA Éditions, Rabat, Morocco), 244–253Google Scholar
  6. Bayemi PH, Webb EC, Ndambi A, Ntam F, Chinda V (2009) Impact of management interventions on smallholder dairy farms of the western highlands of Cameroon. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41:907–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beghin JC 2006. Evolving dairy markets in Asia: recent findings and implications. Food Policy 31:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birouk A, Bouizgaren A, Baya B (1997) Luzerne (Medicago sativa). In: Jaritz G, Bounejmate M (eds.) Production et utilisation des cultures fourragères au Maroc, (INRA Éditions, Rabat, Morocco), pp 129–136Google Scholar
  9. Blinda M, Thivet G (2009) Ressources et demandes en eau en Méditerranée: situation et perspectives. Sécheresse, 20:9–16Google Scholar
  10. Castillo AR, Taverna AM, Páez RR, Cuatrin A, Colombatto D, Bargo F, García MS, García PT, Chavez M, Beaulieu AD, Drackley JK (2006) Fatty acid composition of milk from dairy cows fed fresh alfalfa diets. Ani Feed Sci Technol 131:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delaby L, Faverdin P, Michel G, Disenhaus C, Peyraud JL (2009) Effect of feeding strategies on performances and their evolution during lactation of Holstein and Normande dairy cows. Animal 3:891–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delgado CL (2003) Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution. J Nutr 133:3907 S–3910 SGoogle Scholar
  13. Doreau M, Corson MS, Wiedemann SS (2012) Water use by livestock: a global perspective for a regional issue. Animal Frontiers 2:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faure G, Kleene P (2004) Lessons from new experiences in extension in West Africa: management advice for family farms and farmers’ governance, The J Agric Ext Edu 10:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox DG, Sniffen CJ, O’Connor JD, Russell JB, Van Soest PJ (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. J Anim Sci 70:3578–3596Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert CL, Morgan CW (2010) Food price volatility. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc 365:3023–3034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guessous F (1991) Production fourragère et systèmes animaux, (Actes Éditions, Rabat, Morocco)Google Scholar
  18. Heinrichs AJ, Erb HN, Rogers GW, Cooper JB, Jones CM (2007) Variability in Holstein heifer heart-girth measurements and comparison of prediction equations for live weight. Prev Vet Med 78:333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoekstra AY (2012) The hidden water resource use behind meat and dairy. Animal Frontiers 2:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Reso Manag 21:775–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarrige R (1988) Table des valeurs nutritionnelles des aliments. In: R. Jarrige (ed), Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins, (INRA Éditions, Paris, France), 351–443Google Scholar
  22. Le Gal P-Y, Kuper M, Moulin C-H, Sraïri MT, Rhouma A (2009) Linking water saving and productivity to agro-food supply chains: a synthesis from two North African cases. Irrig Drain 58: S320–S333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin RC, Astatkie T, Cooper JM, Fredeen AH (2005) A comparison of methods used to determine biomass on naturalized swards, J Agron Crop Sci 191:152–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ORMVAT (Regional Office of the Agricultural Development in the Tadla) (2011) Technical achievements of the Regional Office of Agricultural Development in the Tadla region, Fquih Ben Salah, Morocco.
  25. Pacheco F (2006) Dairy production systems in the Entre Douro e Minho region. Remarks about a technical support to farmers, Options Méditerranéennes Series A, 70:179–185Google Scholar
  26. Sraïri MT (2011) Le développement de l’élevage au Maroc: succès relatifs et dépendance alimentaire. Le Courrier de l’Environnement de l’INRA, 60:91–101Google Scholar
  27. Sraïri MT, Kuper CA (2007) Conséquences de la libéralisation des marchés sur les opérateurs de la filière laitière au Maroc, Revue d’Élevage et de Médecine vétérinaire des Pays tropicaux, 60:177–187Google Scholar
  28. Sraïri MT, Kiade N, Lyoubi R, Messad S, Faye B (2009) A comparison of dairy cattle systems in an irrigated perimeter and a suburban region: case study from Morocco. Trop Anim Health Prod 41:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamminga S (2003) Pollution due to nutrient losses and its control in European animal production. Livestock Prod Sci 84:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thornton PK (2010) Livestock production: recent trends, future prospects. Philos Trans Royal Soc B, 365:2853–2867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vérité R, Peyraud JL (1988) Nutrition azotée. In: R. Jarrige (ed.), Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins, (INRA Éditions, Paris, France), pp 75–93Google Scholar
  32. Vermorel M, Coulon JB (1998) Comparison of the National Research Council energy system for lactating cows with four European systems. J Dairy Sci 81:846–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilmink JBM (1987) Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation. Livestock Prod Sci 16:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hassan II Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine InstituteRabatMorocco

Personalised recommendations