Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Malingering, Feigning, and Response Bias in Psychiatric/ Psychological Injury

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 56))

  • 1461 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents an outline for a graduate course in the area of psychological injury and law. Also, it provides a compilation of the study guide questions listed at the end of various chapters to help review and use the book. The general conclusions through the book is that both students and professionals will find it relevant to their research and evaluations in forensic disability, psychological injury and related contexts for law, court, and related purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th ed., text rev). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5, 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anfang, S.A. 2011. Commentary: Disability evaluations – Are the evaluators able? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 39: 194–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babikian, T., K.B. Boone, P. Lu, and G. Arnold. 2006. Sensitivity and specificity of various digit span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 20: 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y.S., and A. Tellegen. 2008/2011. MMPI-2-RF: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, K.J., K.W. Greve, and G. Glynn. 2005. On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal 5: 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briere, J. 2001. Detailed Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J.N., W.G. Dahlstrom, J.R. Graham, A. Tellegen, and B. Kaemmer. 1989. Manual for the restandardized Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: MMPI-2. An interpretive guide. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J.N., J.R. Graham, Y.S. Ben-Porath, A. Tellegen, W.G. Dahlstrom, and G. Kaemmer. 2001. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, P.P., R. Arikan, D.A. Pinals, W.H. Fisher, and P.S. Appelbaum. 2011. Evaluating psychiatric disability: Differences by forensic expertise. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 38: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D.C., J.H. Kramer, E. Kaplan, and B.A. Ober. 1987. California Verbal Learning Test: Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. 2005. Green’s Word Memory Test for Window’s: User’s manual. Edmonton: Green’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M.F., W.J. Baker, and T. Gola. 1994. Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment 6: 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees-Haley, P.R., L.T. English, and W.J. Glenn. 1991. A Fake Bad Scale for the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychological Reports 68: 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R.E., M. Mitchell, B.H. Kim, and L. Hough. 2010. Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance applied assessment. Psychological Bulletin 136: 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G.J., D.J. Viglione, J.L. Mihura, R.E. Erard, and P. Erdberg. 2011. Rorschach Performance Assessment System: Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Toledo: Rorschach Performance Assessment System, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T. 1994. Manual for the MCMI-III. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., R. Davis, and C. Millon. 1997. Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory III: Manual, 2nd ed. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. 1991. Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. 2007. Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual, 2nd ed. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N.W., J.B. Hoelzle, J.J. Sweet, P.A. Arbisi, and G.J. Demakis. 2010. Updated meta-analysis of the MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS): Verified utility in forensic practice. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 24: 701–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., R.M. Bagby, and S.E. Dickens. 1992. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., K.W. Sewell, and N.D. Gillard. 2010. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, second edition: Professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R.D., E. Genovese, R.T. Katz, T.G. Mayer, K.L. Müller, M.I. Ranavaya, and C.R. Brigham. 2008. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment, 6th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slick, D.J., E.M.S. Sherman, and G.L. Iverson. 1999. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 13: 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., and OPA Auto Task Force. 2011. Ontario Psychological Association guidelines for assessment and treatment in auto insurance claims. Psychological Injury and Law 4: 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T.N. 1996. TOMM: The Test of Memory Malingering manual. North Tonawanda: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2007. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Glendon College, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Gerald Young

Authors
  1. Gerald Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, G. (2014). Education. In: Malingering, Feigning, and Response Bias in Psychiatric/ Psychological Injury. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7899-3_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation